LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Calcifications Likely With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
Large Joints and Extremities

Calcifications Likely With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome

May 20, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Secondary#greatertrochantericpainsyndrome#pertrochantericcalcifications

Pertrochanteric calcifications are common among patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome, a new study finds.

“A systematic description of the types and prevalence of these calcifications has not been undertaken. Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence regarding their association with abductor tendon injuries,” wrote the researchers of “Pertrochanteric Calcifications in Patients With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Description, Prevalence, and Correlation With Intraoperatively Diagnosed Hip Abductor Tendon Injuries.”

The study which was published online on May 06, 2021 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine sought to describe the types and prevalence of these calcifications and determine their relationship with hip abductor tendon injuries, including tendinosis, partial-thickness tears, and full-thickness tears.

For the study, data was collected on patients who underwent surgical management for greater trochanteric pain syndrome between April 2008 and February 2020. Eighty-five of the procedures were isolated treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and 628 were ancillary to hip arthroscopy.

The researchers used radiographs to identify pertrochanteric calcifications and during the surgery classified the hip abductor status.

Overall, no tear was found in 340 hips (47.7%), 289 hips (40.5%) had a partial-thickness tear, and 84 hips (11.8%) had a full-thickness tears.

On the radiographs, 102 hips showed proximally directed enthesophytes and 34 had distally directed enthesophytes. Seventy-five of the hips has amorphous calcifications, 47 had isolated ossicles and 110 had surface irregularities.

The presence of any calcification was associated with partial-thickness tears (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.21-2.21]; p = .002) and full-thickness tears (OR, 6.40 [95% CI, 3.91-10.47]; p < .001).

Advertisement

The researchers also reported that distally directed enthesophytes (OR, 10.18 [95% CI, 3.08-33.63]; p < .001) and proximally directed enthesophytes (OR, 8.69 [ 95% CI, 4.66-16.21]; p < .001) had the highest OR for a full-thickness tear (OR, 15.79 [95% CI, 7.55-33.06]; p < .001).

Isolated ossicles had the highest OR for a partial-thickness tear (OR, 1.73 [(%% CI, 0.96-3.13]; p = .070).

The researchers wrote, “Pertrochanteric calcifications were common radiographic findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome and can help guide management in these patients. Proximally and distally directed enthesophytes were strong predictors for the presence of a hip abductor tendon tear, and specifically a full-thickness tear, and increasing size of the findings was associated with more severe tendon injuries.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy