LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Better Outcome Measure for Distal Radius Fixation?
Large Joints and Extremities

Better Outcome Measure for Distal Radius Fixation?

February 15, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Better Outcome Measure for Distal Radius Fixation?
Source: Unsplash and Tom Claes
Secondary#outcomemeasures#distalradiusfixation

In an analysis of six outcome measures for distal radius fixation, researchers recommend the use of QuickDASH, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Flexion-extension arc range and Grip strength fraction up to six months post-surgery and QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation after six months.

“Many standardized outcome measures exist to measure recovery after surgical fixation of distal radius fractures, however, choosing the optimal instrument is difficult. We evaluated responsiveness, ceiling/floor effects, and criterion validity over multiple time intervals across a 2-year follow-up period for six commonly used instruments,” the researchers wrote in “A comparison measures across the recovery period after distal radius fixation – Which to use and when?” The study was published on January 29, 2021 in the Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery.

QuickDASH is a series of 11 self-administered questions on function, symptoms and quality of life related to the upper limb. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation or PRWE was designed to measure pain and disability after distal radius fracture. It is broken down to two subscales: pain and function.

Flexion-extension arc range (FEArc) and grip strength fraction (GripFrac) are rated by the clinician not the patient. The tests focus on range of motion and grip strength, respectively.

Cooney modification of the Green and O’Brian score (CGNO) is wrist-specific and is also clinician rated. It measures pain, functional status, range of motion and grip strength. Sarmiento modification of the Gartland and Werley score (SGNW) includes questions for both the clinician and patient.

The analysis included 259 patients who received open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius fractures between 2012 and 2015. They were all administered the six outcome measures at 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Responsiveness was evaluated by calculating standardized response means (SRM) and Cohen’s d effect sizes (ES).

According to the analysis, SRM (1.5-24 months) were 1.81, 1.77, 1.43, 1.16, 2.23, 2.45 and ES (1.5-24 months) were 1.81, 1.82, 1.95. 1.31, 1.99 and 2.90 for QuickDASH, PRWE, CGNO, SGNW, FEARc and GripFrac, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients against QuickDASH at 24 months were 0.809, 0.248, 0.563, 0.285 and 0.318 for PRWE, CGNO, SGNW, FEArc and GripFrac, respectively. More than 15% of patients reached the maximum score before 6 months for PRWE and SGNW.

“Other measurement properties of outcome measures which lay outside the scope of this study remain relevant and additional high-quality evidence should be considered to fully inform the clinician’s choice of instrument,” the researchers wrote.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy