LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Female Spine Residents NOT So Interested in Maternity Leave
Spine

Female Spine Residents NOT So Interested in Maternity Leave

January 11, 2021 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Female Spine Residents NOT So Interested in Maternity Leave
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Ed Nelson
Secondary#jessebible#pennstatecollegeofmedicine#womeninorthopedics

What is important to women who apply to spine and orthopedic residency programs? Hint, it’s not the maternity leave.

Researchers from the Penn State College of Medicine and Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, both in Hershey, Pennslyvania, have recently published a new study titled, “Factors in Orthopaedic Residency Decision-making for Female Applicants: A Cross-sectional Study.” The study appears in the December 15, 2020 edition of the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Co-author Jesse Bible, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, told OTW, “After two of the female medical students I mentor attended the North American Spine Society Annual Meeting in 2018, they noted the lack of women at the conference and were often assumed to be vendors for medical supply companies rather than medical professionals in training. In discussing this experience with them, we came up with this idea for a research project with the goal of making orthopaedic residency programs more attractive to female applicants.”

So the researchers sent out a two-part survey to female orthopedic residents, asking them to score 17 different characteristics on importance. The survey team then asked these residents to rank their top five things that most influenced their decision when choosing an orthopedic surgery residency. A total of 158 out of 305 individuals responded to the survey.

Traditional Attractors Not so Important

“I think the biggest surprise in our results,” Dr. Bible told OTW, “was that the factors traditionally thought to attract females to programs were some of the lowest ranked including attitudes towards maternity leave, number of female residents, number of female attendings, and gender diversity of faculty and residents. In fact, attitudes towards maternity leave was ranked as the least important factor of the 17 different characteristics investigated.”

“The most important results from this study were the factors rated to be of highest importance: camaraderie among current residents and happiness of current residents and of lowest importance: attitudes towards maternity leave. Program directors looking to attract female applicants to their orthopaedic surgery program may use this data to focus their efforts on displaying resident happiness and camaraderie, instead of showcasing attitudes towards maternity leave and their gender diversity statistics.”

Advice to Residency Programs: Skip the Diversity Stats

“Orthopaedic surgery continues to be the most male-dominated specialty in medicine. We hope that the data we presented here may help to guide program directors wishing to recruit female orthopaedic surgery residents. This is especially relevant with the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions that required interviews to be virtual this year because it can be difficult to assess the culture of a program virtually. We recommended in our discussion to use pictures and videos of the residents outside of the hospital to showcase the camaraderie within their program rather than focusing on gender diversity statistics during their interview day presentations.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy