LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Lower Modified Harris Hip Score Predicts Revision
Large Joints and Extremities

Lower Modified Harris Hip Score Predicts Revision

December 11, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Lower Modified Harris Hip Score Predicts Revision
Source: Unsplash and National Cancer Institute
#hiparthroplastySecondary#patientreportedoutcomes#revisionsurgery

Hip arthroscopy patients with lower modified Harris Hip Scores after the procedure are more likely to need revision surgery or a conversion to hip replacement, researchers say.

In the case-control study, “Can Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict the Need for Secondary Surgeries After Hip Arthroscopy?” published on December 1, 2020 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, the researchers examined patient-reported outcomes at 3 months and 1 year after primary hip arthroscopy.

The researchers wrote, “Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture the postoperative period and reflect the patient’s perspective of one’s own recovery. However, it is unknown if PROs can reflect and predict the need for secondary surgeries after a primary hip arthroscopy.”

They wanted to see if patient reported outcomes after primary hip arthroscopy correlated with future reoperations and what the critical threshold would be.

Data was collected on 911 consecutive patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and August 2018. All the patients had the following PROs preoperative and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively: modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score and Visual Analog Scale for pain.

Patients were split into two groups depending on whether they had a second surgery or not. Then the researchers compared patient variables, intraoperative labral treatment, preoperative PROs and postoperative PROS between the two groups.

Overall, while age, body mass index, labral treatment, and 3-month and 1-year follow-up modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score and Visual Analog Scale were significant in the bivariate analysis, the multivariate logistic regression analysis only found 1-year modified Harris Hip Score to be significant in the final model (p < .05).

The researchers wrote, “The ROC [receiver operator characteristic] curve for 1-year modified Harris Hip Score demonstrated acceptable discrimination between patients requiring secondary surgery and patients not requiring secondary surgery with an area under the curve of 0.73. Using the Youden index, a threshold of 80.5 was determined for the 1-year modified Harris Hip Score.”

They added, “The risk for secondary procedures may be evaluated with modified Harris Hip Score at 1 year after primary hip arthroscopy. Surpassing a score of 80.5 may be associated with a 74.4% reduction in risk for either a revision hip arthroscopy or a conversion to hip replacement.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy