LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/RTI Surgical Foot Compression Plate System Cleared
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

RTI Surgical Foot Compression Plate System Cleared

November 5, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

RTI Surgical Foot Compression Plate System Cleared
Tarsal Fracture / Courtesy of Sports Injury Clinic
#fda510kclearanceSecondary#rtisurgical

RTI Surgical Inc. has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its Dynamic Active Compression (DAC) Plate system.

Stabilization and Fixation

FDA documents state the system, with proprietary compression technology, is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients “for stabilization and fixation of fractures, revisions, osteotomies, arthrodeses and reconstruction of small bones of the foot such as:

  • Midfoot and hindfoot arthrodesis or osteotomies
  • Tarsometatarsal arthrodesis (metatarsocuneiform, metatarsocuboid, Lapidus)
  • Intercuneiform arthrodesis
  • Naviculocuneiform arthrodesis
  • Talonavicular arthrodesis
  • Calcaneocuboid arthrodesis
  • Linsfranc arthrodesis
  • Mono-or-bi-cortical osteotomies in the forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot
  • First metatarsophalangeal arthrodeses.”

Compression

The primary differences in the design of the DAC system from predicate devices are nitinol wires which create compression across the fracture as the release pins are removed during surgery. Another difference is that the system will be labeled as magnetic resonance, conditional on performance testing submitted for support of the claim.

It took the agency just under five months to clear the system.

The System

The system includes screws and plates of varying sizes and configurations to accommodate various patient anatomies. The implant components of the system are manufactured from titanium alloy (ASTM F136) and nitinol (ASTM F2063). The implants are provided non-sterile and are supplied with instrumentation.

Advertisement

Hospital of Special Surgery’s Constantine Demetracopoulos, M.D., said the plate “is designed to improve fusion procedures in the foot by combining the rigid stability of a plate with Nitinol’s ability to provide continuous compression and ensure apposition of the bony surfaces during healing.”

The company’s VP of Sales Jimmy Blanchard said the company’s trauma experience “was crucial in creating the first hardware product we specifically designed for lower extremities in the foot and ankle space.”

In a September 22, 2020 press release, the company said this was its first 510(k) clearance since shareholders approved the sale of RTI’s OEM business to EU private equity firm Montago for $460 million this past July.

Over the past three years under the stewardship of now former president and CEO Camille Farhat, the company returned to profitability, added three significant new product platforms:  Zyga’s SImmetry SI Joint system, Paradigm Spine’s coflex technology and TETRAfuse (2018 winner of Orthopedics This Week’s Spine Technology Award).

RTI is headquartered in Alachua, Florida., and has four manufacturing facilities throughout the U.S. and Europe.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy