LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/EU Launch for WaveWriter Alpha Implantable Spinal Stim
Spine

EU Launch for WaveWriter Alpha Implantable Spinal Stim

October 15, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

EU Launch for WaveWriter Alpha Implantable Spinal Stim
WaveWriter Alpha Portfolio / Courtesy of Boston Scientific Corporation
#bostonscientific#spinalcordstimulationSecondary#wavewriter

Marlborough, Massachusetts-based Boston Scientific Corporation recently announced the launch of the company’s WaveWriter Alpha line of implantable spinal cord stimulators (SCS) in Europe. The portfolio includes a selection of rechargeable or non-rechargeable, Bluetooth-enabled implantable pulse generators, and an array of electrode options. The pulse generators are programable through exterior devices and deliver the prescribed stimulation intended to reduce chronic pain.

The WaveWriter Alpha includes a rechargeable pulse generator available in 16- and 32-lead options; it requires replacement less frequently than the WaveWriter Alpha Prime, a non-rechargeable version, also available with 16 or 32 leads. The lifespan of the implantable pulse generators depend on the stimulation program and frequency of use, the rechargeable version is expected to last at least 5 years, and up to 25 years, while the WaveWriter Alpha Prime, when used on nominal program settings (based on literature) is expected to last 5 years before requiring replacement.

The WaveWriter Alpha systems use a combination therapy to layer paraesthesia, and paraesthesia-free options at the same time. With up to 32 leads, many nerves can be targeted depending on what is needed for a specific patient. The devices were tested in the COMBO randomized control trial by comparing the use of multiple stimulation modalities with conventional SCS therapy (typically referred to as tonic stimulation). The vast majority of patients (88%) responded positively to multiple modalities with greater than 50% reduction in pain, a standard measurement of success in SCS clinical trials. Disability was also greatly improved, with an average of 26 points of improvement.

Jan Vesper, M.D. Ph.D., from University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Germany said, “The combination of different therapy features that promote simplicity like the WaveWriter Alpha SCS Systems enable enhanced personalization in the advanced treatment of chronic pain.”

Jan Willem Kallewaard, M.D., an anesthesiologist from Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands, added his support of the technology and expressed his satisfaction of using it for his patients, “With the WaveWriter Alpha SCS Systems, not only are patients likely to achieve a successful outcome, but their quality of life is also being dramatically improved by regaining many functional abilities.”

“The launch of the WaveWriter Alpha SCS Systems in Europe represent a significant step forward in the treatment of chronic pain,” said company Senior Vice President, and President, Neuromodulation Maulik Nanavaty, Ph.D. “By unifying our portfolio of SCS devices and offering the latest therapy advances, we remain committed to advancing meaningful innovation, providing both physicians and patients access to the full benefits of our entire portfolio of devices.”

The WaveWriter Alpha product line is currently awaiting U.S. FDA approval.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy