LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Nanoscale Bone Inflexibility Hip Fracture Risk Factor
Large Joints and Extremities

Nanoscale Bone Inflexibility Hip Fracture Risk Factor

September 3, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Nanoscale Bone Inflexibility Hip Fracture Risk Factor
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Mikael Häggström, M.D.
#hipfracture#bonemineraldensitySecondary#nanoscalebone

It is not just bone density that is an important hip fracture risk factor, Imperial College London researchers say. Nanoscale bone inflexibility may also play a role.

The researchers in the study, “Nanoscale mechanisms in age-related hip-fractures,” which was published online in Scientific Reports on August 26, 2020, set out to investigate why some people who have healthy bones on DEXA [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry] scans still are at increased risk of hip fracture.

“We tend to think of our bones as solid hard support structures, but flexibility appears to be extremely important in bone health. If bones are too hard, they are less able to absorb impact and more likely to break. Our study suggests that flexibility could be just as important as density in preventing fractures,” said study co-author Ulrich Hansen, Ph.D., of Imperial’s department of Mechanical Engineering.

To examine bone flexibility at the nanoscale, they used high-energy intense beams of X-rays. In particular they were looking at how the collagen and minerals within bone flex and then break apart under a load.

The researchers analyzed bone tissue samples of three groups of donors: those who had not any fractures, those without a bisphosphonate treatment history who had suffered a fractured hip, and those with a bisphosphonate treatment history who had suffered a fractured hip.

Overall, the donors without fractures were more likely to have flexible collagen and mineral nanostructure than those with a hip fracture. In those with fractures, the mineral broke away from the collagen at lower forces.

They also found that bisphosphonate, a common treatment for osteoporosis, appears to lower tissue strength and nanoscale flexibility in people with hip fractures compared to people with hip fractures not on the treatment and the control group.

The reasons for this are unclear, the researchers say and require more study.

Advertisement

“We were surprised to see that bisphosphonate users seemed to have less flexible bone nanostructures. Perhaps after a long period of treatment in some patients, there is a loss of flexibility at the nanoscale that offsets some of the strength benefit from increases in bone density. More research is needed to determine exactly why this is and how this could affect clinical practice in long-term users,” explained Richard Abel, M.D., co-author from Imperial College London’s department of Surgery and Cancer.

“Perhaps we need to build on the existing treatment framework to add new diagnostics, therapies and follow-ups that address nanoscale bone health—and address the collagen, not just the mineral. That way we can treat everyone in the best possible way.”

The researchers hope their findings help develop more preventative treatments of bone fractures.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy