LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Alphatec Has Partial Victory in Court Battle With NuVasive
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Alphatec Has Partial Victory in Court Battle With NuVasive

September 21, 2020 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Alphatec Has Partial Victory in Court Battle With NuVasive
Alphatec and NuVasive logos / Courtesy of Alphatec, NuVasive and pxhere/Mohamed Hassan
#nuvasiveSecondary#alphatec#patrickmiles

In an ongoing battle with NuVasive, Inc., the court’s latest ruling on a motion to dismiss hands Alphatec Holdings, Inc. a partial victory.

The litigation involves NuVasive, Alphatec, and Patrick Miles. Based in California, NuVasive and Alphatec are both medical technology companies focused on spine surgery. Miles is currently the chairman and chief executive officer of Alphatec.

Prior to joining Alphatec, Miles spent 17 years at NuVasive. He resigned from NuVasive as NuVasive’s vice chairman and member of NuVasive’s board of directors. He had previously served as NuVasive’s president and chief operating officer.

The dispute involves Miles’ departure from NuVasive. In the court documents, NuVasive alleges that Miles “developed a scheme while working at NuVasive to decamp to Alphatec, taking confidential information, employees, and customers with him.” In a prior ruling, the court had decided that while Miles had agreed to a non-compete agreement, the agreement was void under California law.

NuVasive filed its original complaint in this action in October 2017. NuVasive filed its second amended complaint against Alphatec and Miles in November 2019. The second amended complaint pleads ten counts, six against Alphatec.

In its second amended complaint for damages, NuVasive’s allegations against Alphatec include unfair competition, tortious interference with contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and deceptive and unfair trade practices under Florida and North Carolina law.

Alphatec filed a motion to dismiss the six counts. The court heard oral arguments in May 2020 and issued its opinion three months later. In its opinion, the court dismissed half of the counts against Alphatec.

The court dismissed NuVasive’s claim of unfair competition, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. The court denied Alphatec’s motion to dismiss NuVasive’s claims for tortious interference with contractual relations and deceptive and unfair trade practices under Florida and North Carolina law.

This is not the first instance of litigation between Alphatec and NuVasive. In 2018 NuVasive filed patent litigation against Alphatec. For OTW’s coverage of the patent litigation, see “District Court Grants Stay in NuVasive Litigation Against Alphatec.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy