LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Biologics/Novel Bioresorbable Alloy Could Lead to Temporary Implants
Biologics

Novel Bioresorbable Alloy Could Lead to Temporary Implants

August 4, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Novel Bioresorbable Alloy Could Lead to Temporary Implants
Alexander Komissarov testing the magnesium alloy / Source: NUST-MISiS
#bioresorbable#dissolvable#magnesiumalloy

Implants made of a material that minimizes inflammation and does not need to be removed after healing could save patients from a lot of unnecessary pain and risk.

Material scientists from Russia’s National University of Science and Technology (NUST) MISIS in Moscow and the University of Western Australia in Perth published their findings in the Journal of Magnesium and Alloys.

In the article, “Gallium-containing magnesium alloy for potential use as temporary implants in osteosynthesis,” the team describes several alloys that they tested. The composition of their chosen alloy is mostly magnesium with 4% by weight of each gallium and zinc.

Head of Hybrid Nanostructured Materials Laboratory at NUST MISIS and co-author of the publication, Alexander Komissarov, Ph.D., said “We have chosen gallium as an alloying element due to its unique properties.” Gallium typically inhibits bone resorption and is often used to treat disorders due to accelerated bone loss. The element also plays a role in the bone regeneration process leading to increased thickness, strength, and mineral content.

Finally, it also has antibacterial properties. The alloy decomposes slowly with little biocorrosion and “has a unique profile of characteristics for use in bone implants due to the optimal combination of mechanical properties and corrosion rate,” concluded Komissarov.

Magnesium alloys have been studied for some time for use as resorbable medical devices. The first commercially available magnesium alloy approved for medical implants is known as Magnezix® and made by Germany-based Syntellix AG. Magnezix contains zinc and calculum, in addition to magnesium and is used to make pins and screws for orthopedic applications.

Current resorbable implants are primarily made from polymers of lactic acid. Spine plates, such as Medtronic’s Mystique were intended to provide fixation while fusion took place, and to dissolve leaving no trace of the implant. Some studies showed that clinical outcomes were similar to titanium plates, but rates of pseudoarthrosis were significantly higher. These observations leave the door open for newer resorbable materials.

A recent review, “Biodegradable Magnesium‐Based Implants in Orthopedics—A General Review and Perspectives,” published in Advanced Science discusses the many potential benefits of magnesium alloys for spine and orthopedic use. For example, despite its high strength, it has a Young’s modulus close to that of bone. Mismatches in this measure of elasticity is a predictor of subsidence.

Advertisement

Additionally, as the fourth most prevalent mineral in the body and an essential element in biochemical processes, ions released through degradation are easily taken up by the body, and excess excreted.

Lastly, the review presented evidence that magnesium promotes osteogenic differentiation, enhances angiogenesis, inhibits osteoclastogenesis, and modulates osteoimmunological responses. All of these effects promote the growth of new and healthy bone.

The gallium-containing magnesium alloy, as well as others in development, have the potential to make an impact in the spine and orthopedic device market that has been dominated by PEEK and titanium for decades.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy