LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Hip Patients More Satisfied (or Forgetful) Than Knee Patients?
Large Joints and Extremities

Hip Patients More Satisfied (or Forgetful) Than Knee Patients?

August 31, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Hip Patients More Satisfied (or Forgetful) Than Knee Patients?
#totalkneearthroplasty#totalhiparthroplastySecondary#forgottenjointscore

Interesting question.

A group of NYU Langone Health researchers decided to find out and they chose one specific measure of patient satisfaction, the Forgotten Joint Score, to measure assess the hip arthroplasty outcomes to knee arthroplasty outcomes.

The Forgotten Joint Scores, by the way, are based on a novel construct: the patient’s ability to forget about a joint as a result of successful treatment.

“Surgeons often judge the success of an operation on joint alignment and stability, but patients evaluate outcomes in terms of vitality and ability to return to their leisure activities,” explained the study’s authors.

To get an answer, the research team culled data from 2,359 individuals who had surgery between September 2016 and September 2019 and who had completed the Forgotten Joint Score-12 questionnaire at one of three time periods (3, 12, and 21 months) postoperatively. Samples questions included, “Are you aware of your artificial hip/knee in bed at night? When you are squatting? When you are climbing stairs.”

Co-author Ran Schwarzkopf, M.D. associate professor in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at NYU Langone Health in New York City, explained the objectives of the study to OTW, “We wanted to examine the differences between THA [total hip arthroplasty] patients and TKA [total knee arthroplasty] patients in regard to the patient’s perception of their artificial joint. The Forgotten Joint Score is a validated outcome measure that helps us understand the patient’s perception and satisfaction from their artificial joint. We know that for 10-15% of TKA patients we fail to meet their expectation after TKA. This fact motivated us to compare the Forgotten Joint Score outcomes between THA and TKA and to try to understand the differences between the two patient populations.”

“Among the most interesting findings were the expected differences between the THA and TKA cohorts. We hypothesized that THA patients had higher Forgotten Joint Scores compared to TKA in all time points. We also observed that patients undergoing TKA tend to be older, have a higher BMI [body mass index], and have more comorbidities in comparison to THA patients.”

And with a tip of the hat to the elderly set, he added, “Especially interesting was that in both cohorts, THA and TKA, older patients had higher Forgotten Joint Scores.”

Advertisement

“The work helps us better understand how patients perceive their total joint replacement during and after recovery. We are able to anticipate their improvement over the first year, and we understand that our older patients do better than our younger ones and that THA patients do better than TKA patients.”

“As surgeons we need to improve and try to better match our TKA patients’ expectations. In my practice I try and explain to my patients what to expect after surgery and to make sure their goals are achievable and that they will be satisfied from their recovery and ultimate activity level.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy