LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/THA, TKA Outcomes Steadily Improving – New Data
Large Joints and Extremities

THA, TKA Outcomes Steadily Improving – New Data

July 28, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

THA, TKA Outcomes Steadily Improving – New Data
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Benjamin Broussard
#hipreplacement#kneereplacementSecondary

A new study from Yale University’s School of Medicine looking at data from 2.1 million total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty cases has found that both complication rates and readmission rates declined steadily between 2010 and 2017.

Their study, “Quality Measure Public Reporting Is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Hip and Knee Replacement,” appears in the July 15, 2020 edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Co-author Lisa Suter, M.D., of the Yale-New Haven Health System Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, described the genesis of this project to OTW. “This work arose from regular monitoring of hospital performance and quality measure results performed by the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE) under contract to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”

“Starting in 2013, CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] has publicly reported hospital-level total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) risk-standardized complication and readmissions rates (RSCRs and RSRRs). CORE developed the THA/TKA complication and readmission quality measures (under contract to CMS) and reevaluates the measures annually.”

“This paper summarizes hospital measure results over several years and explores the temporal association of trends in measure results with their public reporting and inclusion in payment programs. The total hip and total knee readmission measure was included in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program starting in 2015 and the total hip and total knee complication measure was included in CMS’ Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program starting in 2019.”

Suter’s research team used data from Medicare’s fee-for-service beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older (HIPPA compliant) and who’d been discharged from non-federal acute-care hospitals following an elective primary THA and/or TKA. The research team excluded patients who’d had nonelective arthroplasty procedures, had mechanical complications present on admission, or received arthroplasty-related procedures associated with a substantially different outcome risk (those undergoing revision, partial hip replacement and/or resurfacing, or removal of implanted devices).

According to the study authors, “For readmission data, all eligible hospitalizations from July 2010 to June 2017 were included. For complication data, all eligible hospitalizations from April 2010 to March 2017 were included…”

In total, 2,148,823 elective primary THA and TKA procedures performed at 3,705 hospitals from 2010 to 2017 were included in this study’s in the complication analysis; 2,240,438 procedures from 3,702 hospitals were included in the readmission analysis.

Sounding cautiously optimistic, Dr. Suter told OTW, “Both the rates of and variation in hospital-level THA/TKA complication and readmission outcomes declined steadily between 2010 and 2017. There is evidence supporting that clinical efforts to improve outcomes and perioperative care for joint replacement patients has led to reduced complications and readmissions after elective primary THA/TKA procedures. This paper demonstrates that outcomes are improving after elective primary THA/TKA procedures. However, ongoing monitoring for unintended consequences of measurement is needed.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy