LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Fort Worth Orthopedist Indicted for Healthcare Fraud
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Fort Worth Orthopedist Indicted for Healthcare Fraud

July 6, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Fort Worth Orthopedist Indicted for Healthcare Fraud
Source: PxHere
#falseclaimsactSecondary#fraud#markkuper#texascenterfororthopedicandspinaldisorders

An indictment filed by the United States claims a fire that destroyed a Texas orthopedist’s home was started to destroy evidence of a healthcare fraud scheme.

In October 2017, a fire destroyed the $1.6 million Fort Worth home of Mark Kuper, D.O. and his wife Melissa Kuper (Melissa). The fire spread from an outdoor fireplace where firefighters purportedly found charred and burned medical and billing records.

The fire occurred a year after a claim was brought against Dr. Kuper for violations of the False Claims Act and the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act. Dr. Kuper owned Texas Center for Orthopedic and Spinal Disorders (TCOSD). TCOSD had two locations in Fort Worth and Weatherford.

In May 2020, the United States and Texas filed complaints in partial intervention in the action. The intervener complaint alleges Dr. Kuper and TCOSD submitted over 100,000 fraudulent claims to federal healthcare programs. The complaint asserts that Dr. Kuper billed federal programs for over 100 hours in a single day on 139 different occasions.

A month later, the United States filed an indictment against Dr. Kuper, Melissa, and Travis Couey. Melissa reportedly worked in management roles at both locations. Couey was a licensed physical therapist at both locations.

In the indictment, the United States alleges that from 2014 through 2017 the defendants engaged in fraudulent healthcare billing that took advantage of patients who were “underserved, disadvantaged, and elderly.” The government claims the defendants submitted claims for “over $10 million to Medicare, Medicaid, and TRICARE for services that were not rendered.”

In support of the fraud claim, the United States asserts Dr. Kuper billed for 60-minute psychotherapy sessions when he only saw patients for 15 to 20 minutes. In many instances the government alleges that Dr. Kuper was not even at the clinic during the patient visits. Additionally, Couey purportedly “helped to create and maintain false medical records” for services he never rendered.

The United States does not believe that those treating patients for psychotherapy appointments were trained to provide such services. In support of this claim, the government pointed out that Dr. Kuper himself was only trained in orthopedics, not psychotherapy.

Advertisement

The indictment emphasized that Dr. Kuper personally billed times for services not possible in a 24-hour window. The government claims that in one instance Dr. Kuper billed for 140 hours of medical services in a 24-hour day.

The United States also asserts the defendants prescribed highly addictive controlled substances to patients to ensure patients would return for treatment. The United States contends that Melissa illegally dispensed and authorized prescriptions for controlled substances. She is not a licensed medical provider.

On June 22, 2020, the defendants appeared in court and entered pleas of not guilty. A jury trial is set for July 27, 2020.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy