LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA and EU Regulators Clear New Pediatric Plating System
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA and EU Regulators Clear New Pediatric Plating System

July 24, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA and EU Regulators Clear New Pediatric Plating System
JuniOrtho Plating System / Courtesy of Orthofix Medical Inc.
#fda510kclearance#orthofixSecondary#pediatricdeformities

Orthofix Medical Inc. has received both FDA 510(k) clearance and European CE Mark approval for the company’s JuniOrtho Plating System to correct deformities internally in kids and small stature adults. It took the FDA about four months to clear the system.

This lies at the heart of orthopedics, which in the Greek language means straightening (ortho) children (paidos).

JuniOrtho Plating System

According to the FDA clearance summary, the system is intended for “internal fixation and stabilization of fractures, osteotomies, mal-unions and non-unions of long bones of the lower limb,” and is indicated for “internal fixation and stabilization of femoral and tibial fractures, osteotomies, mal-unions and non-unions.”

Indications include:

  • Varus, valgus, rotational and/or shortening osteotomies
  • Femoral neck and/or pertrochanteric fractures
  • Proximal and distal metaphyseal fractures
  • Pathological and impeding pathological fractures

The system consists of various plate size and shape ranges, designed, according to FDA documents, “to accept locking and cortical bone screws, which are available in a variety of diameters and lengths, in order to support internal fixation and stabilization of fractures, osteotomies, mal-unions and non-unions in long bones of lower limbs.” The implants would be offered both in sterile and non-sterile packaging configurations.

Pre-Operative Planning Software

In a July 20, 2020 press release, the company said the system is complemented by a pre-operative planning software option that “streamlines the implant selection prior to the surgical procedure. This unique platform enables the surgeon to accurately plan the osteotomy position to visualize the implant in relation to the anatomy. This aids in the selection of the precise size of device to ensure the best fit and optimal positioning for the patient’s body.

Advertisement

That’s a long way from the old days when it was necessary to manually plan deformity correction surgery using tracing paper and scissors.

“Specifically developed to be used in combination with the JuniOrtho Plating System, the software is currently available in Europe and planned for release in the U.S. later this year.”

Commenting in the press release, Philip McClure, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at the International Center for Limb Lengthening in Baltimore, Maryland, said the field of deformity correction is “rapidly evolving with multiple technical and technological advances every year. External fixators are an incredibly powerful tool in caring for deformities in children around the world. Improved designs of internal fixation devices have allowed us to provide complimentary options to external fixators to benefit our patients and their families.”

Company President and CEO Jon Serbousek noted Orthofix can now offer surgeons both internal and external fixation systems with an expanded portfolio of pediatric deformity care solutions.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy