LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Either Docking or Modified Jobe Good for Elbow UCLR
Large Joints and Extremities

Either Docking or Modified Jobe Good for Elbow UCLR

July 30, 2020 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Either Docking or Modified Jobe Good for Elbow UCLR
Source: Glitzyqueen00 at English and Wikimedia
Secondary#dockingtechnique#modifiedjobetechnique#ulnarligamentreconstruction

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) of the elbow with either the docking or the modified Jobe technique both offer patients excellent results, according to a new study.

The study, “Modified Jobe Versus Docking Technique for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes,” was published on June 29, 2020 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

The modified Jobe technique involves using a series of tunnels in the ulna and humerus to pass the graft in a figure-8 formation. With the docking technique, however, the graft is secured over a bone bridge and never requires a submuscular ulnar nerve transposition.

While previous systematic reviews have suggested that the docking technique was superior to the modified Jobe technique, those reviews included studies in which the flexor-pronator mass was detached and a submuscular ulnar nerve transposition was required.

This systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis identified 21 studies that included 1,842 UCL reconstructions, 320 using the docking technique and 1,466 using the modified Jobe or figure-of-8 technique.

Overall, without controlling for the effect of flexor-pronator detachment and submuscular ulnar nerve transposition, there were a larger percentage of excellent outcomes with the docking technique (86.58%; 95% of CI, 80.42%-91.85%) than with the figure-of-8 reconstruction (76.76%; 95% of CI, 69.65%-83.25%; p = .031).

When those effects were controlled for, however, there was no significant difference between the two techniques (p = .139). There was no significant difference between techniques in time to return to sports (p = .729), although there was no return to play data available for reconstructions with flexor-pronator detachment and submuscular ulnar nerve transposition.

The researchers wrote, “There was no significant difference in the proportion of excellent Conway Scale Outcomes or [return to play] time between the docking and modified Jobe techniques for UCL reconstruction where the [flexor-pronator] was preserved and routine submuscular ulnar nerve transposition was not performed.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy