LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Nanosynthetic Bone Graft Cleared for U.S. Market
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Nanosynthetic Bone Graft Cleared for U.S. Market

June 22, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Nanosynthetic Bone Graft Cleared for U.S. Market
Osteo3 ZP Putty / Courtesy of Sirakoss, Ltd
#fda510kclearanceSecondary#bonegraft#sirakoss

UK-based Sirakoss Ltd, has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its nanosynthetic bone graft substitute, Osteo3 ZP Putty. Synthetic bone grafts are used to fuse bones together during surgery or after a traumatic injury where the bone fails to heal.

In a June 17, 2020 announcement, the company said the putty is “an entirely synthetic, nanoporous bone graft substitute composed of novel inorganic granules suspended in a fully-synthetic resorbable carrier.” The putty was designed to “catalyse rapid and complete bone regeneration and can be used immediately, directly from the pack.”

It took the FDA about seven months to determine the putty was substantially equivalent to Apatech Ltd’s putty cleared in 2007.

Spinal Fusion and Trauma Repair

The company’s Co-Founder and Director of R&D Professor Iain Gibson said the putty has demonstrated “excellent pre-clinical performance in models of spinal fusion and trauma repair…. Being able to provide surgeons with the synthetic bone graft in a pre-packed syringe, saves time and is far easier to handle during the procedure in the operating room environment.” Gibson is a Professor of Acellular Regenerative Medicine at Aberdeen University.

Osteo3 ZP Putty

FDA documents state Osteo3 ZP Putty is indicated for filling bone voids or defects of the skeletal system (i.e., the extremities, pelvis, and posterolateral spine) “that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure.” The putty is “resorbed and replaced with bone during the healing process. Osteo3 ZP Putty must be used with morselized autograft bone at a ratio of 1:1 by volume in the posterolateral spine.”

The FDA product description describes the putty as an “osteoconductive, resorbable, porous, 100% nanosynthetic calcium phosphate” bone void filler, containing 5.8 wt% silicon-substituted calcium phosphate granules suspended in a resorbable polymer gel.” The final, finished Osteo3 ZP Putty is “30 wt% granules and 70 wt% polymer gel. The high surface area porous granules have been designed to deliver consistent and rapid bone ingrowth, remodeling and cell-mediated resorption during the bone healing process.

Advertisement

“The aqueous polymer gel phase binds the highly porous granules into a moldable, pliable formulation which enables Osteo3 ZP Putty to be implanted directly from the packaging without any further gelation, mixing or graft setting time.”

The products is provided sterile to the end user in 5 cc and 10 cc sizes and, as stated in the FDA documents, can be used immediately, directly from the pack.

The company’s Director Tom Buckland said the clearance enables the company to implement the commercial strategy for “this game-changing product.”

Sirakoss Ltd

The company was spun out of the University of Aberdeen in 2011 based on the research of Professor Gibson and is supported through financing from Epidarex Capital and Scottish Investment Bank, the investment arm of Scottish Enterprise together with grant funding from Innovate UK.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy