LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/ConforMIS Settles Patent Disputes With Zimmer for $9.6 Million
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

ConforMIS Settles Patent Disputes With Zimmer for $9.6 Million

June 4, 2020 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

ConforMIS Settles Patent Disputes With Zimmer for $9.6 Million
Source: Pixabay/geralt; Zimmer Biomet, ConforMIS Inc.
#zimmerbiometSecondary#conformis#patentinfringement

Billerica, Massachusetts-based ConforMIS Inc. has entered into a settlement and license agreement with Zimmer Biomet to resolve all existing patent disputes between the companies for $9.6 million.

ConforMIS is a medical technology company that develops, manufactures, and sells customized joint replacement implants and instruments that “fit each patient’s unique anatomy.” Its main product offerings include knee and hip replacement products.

Zimmer Biomet is a Warsaw, Indiana-based medical device company that designs, manufactures, and markets solutions to support orthopedic surgeons and clinicians in more than 100 countries worldwide. Zimmer includes Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer US, Inc., and Biomet Manufacturing, LLC.

The settlement comes after last year’s litigation between the parties. Last year ConforMIS sued Zimmer for patent infringement related to its joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools. Zimmer also sued ConforMIS for patent infringement related to its knee replacement systems.

Pursuant to the agreement, ConforMIS and Zimmer will dismiss all outstanding litigation between the parties. Additionally, the parties will not pursue future litigation against each other regarding their various commercialized joint replacement products. Specifically, their knee and hip replacement products as well as Zimmer’s shoulder replacement products.

The parties have also cross-licensed their technology. ConforMIS granted to Zimmer a “royalty-free, non-exclusive, worldwide license to certain patents for the exploitation of patient-specific or partially patient-specific instrumentation for knee, shoulder or hip replacement.” Zimmer granted to ConforMIS a “fully paid-up, royalty-free, non-exclusive, worldwide license to certain patents for the exploitation of implants and patient-specific instruments for knee replacement.”

Within 30 days of the agreement, Zimmer will pay ConforMIS $3.5 million. Zimmer will make additional payments to ConforMIS through January 15, 2021.

In the ConforMIS press release, ConforMIS President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Augusti said, “We are glad to have reached a mutually productive settlement of all current patent litigation with Zimmer Biomet and are pleased to have the company become a licensee.”

Augusti continued, “Through this settlement, we have once again monetized our patient-specific instrument patents and steadfastly protected our core business of patient-specific implants.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy