LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Screw Fixation in Metastatic Bone via the “Tripod” Method
Large Joints and Extremities

Screw Fixation in Metastatic Bone via the “Tripod” Method

March 30, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Screw Fixation in Metastatic Bone via the “Tripod” Method
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Lucasbosch
Secondary#pelvicfractures#bonecancer#percutaneousreconstruction

A novel method for treating pelvic fractures in metastatic bone cancer patients is the subject of a new study from the Montefiore Health System in New York City.

The chief investigators are Montefiore’s orthopedic oncology surgeons and their study, “A Novel Tripod Percutaneous Reconstruction Technique in Periacetabular Lesions Caused by Metastatic Cancer,” appears in the February 19, 2020 edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

The “tripod” technique is one where surgeons place multiple screws through very small incisions thereby connecting the fractured pelvic bones and the pelvis. According to the team who studied this technique, the “tripod” technique, which refers to the configuration of screw placement, adequately supports the hip socket joint.

“This approach goes against the conventional notion that bone affected by cancer is too weak and needs to be completely replaced,” said lead author Rui Yang, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at Montefiore, and an assistant professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine. “Our study shows that using this technique means patients don’t need to undergo a longer, more aggressive surgery. They recover and go home quicker, have less pain, and most importantly, can resume therapies targeted at treating their cancer.”

“We are pleased to find this technique results in better outcomes for our patients,” said co-author David Geller, M.D., orthopedic oncologist and vice-chairman, Strategy and Innovation, Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore and associate professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine. “And we are surprised to find that despite conventional wisdom, many of our patients heal their fractures and experience new bone growth.”

“Most of the patients in this study were able to get out of bed and bear weight on the same day as the surgery,” said Dr. Yang. “None of them needed a blood transfusion and there were no wound-healing issues. We hope that other surgeons will consider this approach so that patients have one less issue to deal with, while they undergo cancer treatment.”

Dr. Yang told OTW, “The most important thing for orthopaedic surgeons to know is that for patients with periacetabular metastatic lesions, the tripod technique offers a minimally invasive approach for pain control and functionality improvement, as compared to the modified total hip replacement as currently commonly practiced. It is safe and effective, as shown in our pilot study.”

“As with healthcare institutions throughout New York, we are dealing with COVID-19 patients and are strictly adhering to guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and local public health agencies. As of now, all elective surgeries and procedures are cancelled to protect stocks of supplies, staffing and potential space for COVID-19 patients.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy