LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/New Nerve Growth Factor Inhibitor Submitted to FDA
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

New Nerve Growth Factor Inhibitor Submitted to FDA

March 20, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Nerve Growth Factor Inhibitor Submitted to FDA
Source: Wikimedia commons and British Columbia Institute of Technology
#osteoarthritisSecondary#pfizer#tanezumab

A novel non-opioid chronic pain medication has been submitted to the FDA under the Biologic License Application (BLA) rules by New York-based Pfizer Inc. and Indianapolis, Indiana-based Eli Lilly and Company.

The new drug, tanezumab 2.5 mg would eventually be commercialized as a non-opioid chronic pain inhibitor for patients with chronic pain due to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA). Tanezumab is administered subcutaneously (SC). Furthermore, the drug is meant for patients who have gotten little or no pain relief with other analgesics.

Pfizer described tanezumab as “a monoclonal antibody that is part of an investigational class of non-opioid chronic pain medications known as nerve growth factor (NGF) inhibitors.” The submission involves data from 39 Phase 1-3 clinical studies which evaluated the safety and efficacy of tanezumab in more than 18,000 patients (including three Phase 3 studies evaluating SC administration of tanezumab in patients with moderate-to-severe OA).

“The FDA acceptance of the tanezumab application represents a significant milestone, and the breadth of our regulatory submission reflects the extensive clinical data we have gathered for tanezumab over the course of its development,” said Ken Verburg, tanezumab development team leader, Pfizer Global Product Development.

“There is an urgent need for innovation in the treatment of osteoarthritis, as there have been no new classes of medicines available for this debilitating condition in more than a decade. If approved, tanezumab would be a first-in-class treatment for patients suffering from chronic pain due to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis who have experienced inadequate pain relief with other analgesics.”

“Osteoarthritis patients face a significant burden—due to the physical pain they experience, nearly every aspect of their lives can be impacted. This pain can affect their ability to participate in daily activities, which can have significant psychological, social and societal consequences,” said Patrik Jonsson, president, Lilly Bio-Medicines. “We look forward to working closely with the FDA to potentially bring tanezumab to patients living with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.”

Ken Verburg described the next steps to OTW: “We look forward to continuing to work closely with the FDA as they review the submission over the coming months. We continue to see high unmet need in osteoarthritis. In fact, there are an estimated 27 million Americans living with osteoarthritis, 11 million of whom have moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis. Many are cycling through therapies without relief. We believe tanezumab has the potential to be an important first-in-class, non-opioid treatment option for patients suffering from chronic pain due to moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis who have experienced inadequate pain relief with other analgesics.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy