LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/EEOC Sues Yale Hospital Alleging Age/Disability Discrimination
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

EEOC Sues Yale Hospital Alleging Age/Disability Discrimination

March 2, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

EEOC Sues Yale Hospital Alleging Age/Disability Discrimination
Aerial view of the campus of Yale-New Haven Hospital in Connecticut, including Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven and Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital. / Source: Wikipedia
Secondary#americanswithdisabilityact#agedescriminationinemployment#eeoc

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has sued Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH) in federal court, charging that YNHH’s requirement that medical staff age 70 and older undergo cognitive testing violates federal anti-discrimination law.

The EEOC filed suit under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Title I of the Civil Rights Act, to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of age, to redress interference with rights protected under the ADA, to stop medical examinations in violation of the ADEA and ADA, and to provide appropriate relief to aggrieved employees and individuals who were adversely affected by such practices.

In the pleadings, the EEOC alleges that YNHH has adopted and implemented what it calls a “Late Career Practitioner Policy” (“the Policy”). The Policy requires any individual age 70 and older (“age 70+”) who applies for, or seeks to renew, medical staff privileges at YNHH to take both an ophthalmologic and a neuropsychological medical examination. The EEOC further claims that individuals and employees younger than age 70 are not subject to this requirement.

The EEOC argues that by subjecting only age 70+ applicants to, and age 70+ employees of, YNHH to the Policy, YNHH violates the ADEA. The EEOC further argues that by subjecting its employees to the Policy, YNHH violates the ADA’s prohibition against subjecting employees to medical examinations that are not job-related and consistent with business necessity.

The EEOC alleges that because YNHH medical staff privileges are a condition of employment as a clinical faculty member of the Yale School of Medicine and other local employers, the Policy interferes with the enjoyment of rights protected by the ADA of Yale School of Medicine employees and other local medical employees.

The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut (EEOC v. Yale New Haven Hospital, Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00187). The EEOC seeks compensatory and punitive damages and injunctive relief, which includes the elimination of the Policy.

Mark D’Antonio, media relations for Yale New Haven Hospital, told OTW, “Yale New Haven Hospital’s late career practitioner policy is designed to protect our patients from potential harm while including safeguards to ensure that our physicians are treated fairly. The policy is modeled on similar standards in other industries and we are confident that no discrimination has occurred and will vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.”

YNHH is a 1,541-bed private, nonprofit teaching hospital located in New Haven, Connecticut. It is owned and operated by the Yale New Haven Health system. YNHH is the primary teaching hospital for Yale School of Medicine. “With two main campuses, Yale New Haven is the largest acute care provider in southern Connecticut and one of the Northeast’s major referral centers.”

According to the EEOC press release, “The EEOC’s New York District Office oversees New York, Northern New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy