LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/The Data Is In: Tennis Best for Musculoskeletal Health
Sports Medicine

The Data Is In: Tennis Best for Musculoskeletal Health

February 6, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

The Data Is In: Tennis Best for Musculoskeletal Health
Source: Pxhere
Secondary#musculoskeletalhealth#sportshealth#tennis

Playing tennis is more effective at preventing musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions than going to the gym.

That’s the conclusion of a recent study (“The Musculoskeletal Health Benefits of Tennis”) published in the journal, Sports Health. “Tennis players displayed significantly greater upper body MSK function than nonplayers when cluster scores of body fat percentage, handgrip strength, and flexor carpi radialis fatigue were compared by analysis of covariance, using age as a covariate (tennis players, 0.33 ± 1.93 vs nonplayers, −0.26 ± 1.66; P < 0.05).”

“Similarly, tennis players also demonstrated greater lower extremity function in a cluster of body fat percentage, knee extension strength, and rectus femoris fatigue (tennis players, 0.17 ± 1.76 vs nonplayers, −0.16 ± 1.70; P < 0.05).”

The “…improved MSK functionality in tennis players when compared with age-matched healthy active nonplayers…” was thought to be the result of the “…hybrid high-intensity interval training nature of tennis.”

The study, led by Matthew Jackson, BSc, MSc, PhD, an exercise physiologist, was conducted at Liverpool Hope University. Ninety participants took part in the study. There were 43 tennis players (18 men, 25 women) and 47 nonplayers (26 men, 21 women).

“MSK function was assessed by cluster analysis of 3 factors: (1) electromyographic fatigability of prime movers during handgrip, knee extension, and knee flexion; (2) isometric strength in the aforementioned movements; and (3) body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Maximal oxygen uptake was also assessed to characterize cardiorespiratory fitness.”

The relevance to musculoskeletal providers is that the findings suggest that tennis “is an excellent activity mode to promote MSK health and should therefore be more frequently recommended as a viable alternative to existing physical activity guidelines.”

Jackson says in the Sports Health article that there’s something unique about tennis that makes it so beneficial. Former tennis champion, Bjorn Borg described tennis as a thousand short sprints.

Advertisement

Jackson added that as we age, we lose muscle mass and bone mineral density over time. “It happens to all of us. But when you reach 50 years old, the process accelerates much quicker and we need to target and advise this demographic about the dangers.”

“Lots of people are active in their younger years but by the time they reach their 40s, they’re giving up and often go a decade or so without doing anything. And we want to get people in those age groups as active as possible to avoid things like osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and sarcopenia—as being inactive is likely to make you obese, which can exacerbate the symptoms of all three.”

“Tennis is great as an all-round sport. It targets the cardiovascular system but also improves your muscle mass and you bone mineral density because it’s a weight-bearing sport that incorporates aspects of power and strength. Equally important is the social aspect of playing tennis – and if you enjoy it, you’re more likely to keep doing it.”

One last thing, the National Institutes of Health names tennis as one of the weight-bearing activities well suited to building strong bones.

Eric Clapton and his supergroup Cream also had some good advice about tennis in 1968. Enjoy.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy