LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Complication Data for Orthopedic Patients With Sickle Cell
Large Joints and Extremities

Complication Data for Orthopedic Patients With Sickle Cell

February 3, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Complication Data for Orthopedic Patients With Sickle Cell
Source: Wikimedia Commons and National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
Secondary#hiposteoarthritis#sicklecelldisease#vasoocclusiveevent

One center’s experience with orthopedic patients with sickle cell disease did not match the experience as described in the literature. Since there is a paucity of data regarding orthopedic patients with sickle cell disease, this Boston Medical Center team took a fresh look at complication rates for orthopedic patients with sickle cell.

Their work, “Epidemiology and Perioperative Complications in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease After Orthopaedic Surgery: 26 Years’ Experience at a Major Academic Center,” appears in the December 1, 2019 edition of the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Co-author Emily J. Curry, research project manager in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Boston Medical Center in Massachusetts, explained the genesis of this study to OTW, “We first recognized that there was a paucity of literature that specifically examined perioperative complication rates in patients with sickle cell disease who had undergone orthopedic surgery. What literature that did exist cited complications rates that far exceeded what we had observed clinically—specifically our patients were not experiencing vasoocclusive events in the immediate postoperative period with the same frequency as other papers had reported.”

“Given that Boston Medical Center is one of the largest sickle cell disease centers in the Northeast, we wanted to evaluate our unique patient population to better understand if our clinical predictions in fact aligned with diminished perioperative complication rates, and if so, to offer any insight as to why that may be.”

The researchers conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients referred to their orthopedic surgery department between 1990 and 2016, for a total of 96 orthopedic surgeries. The authors wrote, “The majority of the patients with sickle cell disease were African American (90.3%) and women (60.4%). The most common surgical intervention was for hip osteonecrosis. Only 11.5% of the patients (11 of 96) experienced a perioperative complication, with the vasoocclusive event being the most common (7 patients; 64%).”

The authors described what they learned from the study to OTW, “Working together with pulmonologists and sickle cell disease experts, we demonstrated that, while not as common as previously reported, vasoocclusive events, particularly acute chest syndrome, are the main complications that orthopedic surgeons must be aware of.”

“As such, we recommend that orthopedic surgeons work closely with hematologists and anesthesiologists when coordinating care for these patients. While our work is still ongoing, we suggest that all patients have a preoperative hematology consult prior to surgery.”

“In addition, we recommend that for all patients with a hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL, they be transfused preoperatively so that their hemoglobin value falls above this threshold. We believe that these guidelines have contributed to the overall decreased complication rates we have observed in our patients.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy