LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Four Patients Sue DCH Health System After Ransomware Attack
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Four Patients Sue DCH Health System After Ransomware Attack

January 6, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Four Patients Sue DCH Health System After Ransomware Attack
Source: Soumil Kumar / Pexels
Secondary#databreach#ransomware#cybersecurity

Four patients filed a lawsuit against DCH Health System after a ransomware attack shut down DCH Health System’s three hospitals to all but critical patients and exposed patients’ private information.

The four patients filed suit against DCH Healthcare Authority d/b/a DCH Health System in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Western Division on December 23, 2019.

In the complaint, the patients asserted claims for negligence, an intrusion upon seclusion, negligence per se, breach of express contract, breach of implied contract, and breach of fiduciary duty. The patients also alleged that DCH Health System violated federal medical privacy laws when the ransomware attacker gained access to their medical records and billing information.

In the lawsuit, plaintiff-patient Geraldine Daniels alleged “As a post-surgical patient at DCH, she suffered severe pain and couldn’t get the medications that were prescribed to her during her stay for numerous hours after her surgery.”

Sheneka Frieson, filed as a plaintiff on behalf of a 7-year-old girl who went to a DCH Health System facility for an allergic reaction that caused the girl’s eyes to swell shut. At the facility, she was told that it would be a four to five hour wait for treatment. Her other options were to drive to Walgreens for medications or drive to Birmingham for treatment. She alleged that “as a consequence of this disruption to her medical care,” it took three days for the girl’s swelling to go down.

Prior to the ransomware attack, plaintiff Kimberly Turner received X-rays and medical treatment at a DCH Health System facility. She alleged that “During the Ransomware attack, all her medical document files were lost or inaccessible, and everything that was on file was lost or inaccessible.” She claimed that she had to have new X-rays taken and her medical care was disrupted.

Plaintiff Mary Williams claimed that her “medical records were compromised, and her medical care disrupted as a direct and proximate result of the Ransomware Attack.”

When the attack occurred DCH Health System reported “Early Oct. 1, the DCH Health System discovered that it had suffered a ransomware attack that impacted their systems. We immediately implemented emergency procedures to continue providing safe and patient-centered care. While the attack has impacted DCH’s ability to accept new patients, we are still able to provide critical medical services to those who need it. Patients who have non-emergency medical needs are encouraged to seek assistance from other providers while DCH works to restore its systems.”

Advertisement

It took DCH Health System over a week to restore their systems and hospitals to full functionality. On October 5, 2019 DCH Health System reported “we have obtained a decryption key from the attacker to restore access to locked systems.”

Is suing health systems after a data breach the newest trend? For OTW’s coverage of a recent data breach lawsuit, see “Victims Can Sue Ortho Clinics if Data Hacked.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy