LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Schedules Virtual Reality Workshop in March
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Schedules Virtual Reality Workshop in March

January 27, 2020 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Schedules Virtual Reality Workshop in March
Source: Medical Virtual Reality.Org
Secondary#augmentedreality#orthopedictraining#virtualreality

The FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) announced on January 16, 2020, that it will host a public workshop on March 5 to discuss virtual and augmented reality in medicine.

Virtual and augmented reality technologies are gaining use in such areas as surgical training and planning and providing surgeons with hands-free access to patient data during procedures.

For instance, Intuitive Surgical, won FDA clearance last year for augmented reality product IRIS. It’s designed to help surgeons before and during procedures by showing them 3D images of patient anatomy. At Medtronic, each of its divisions is reportedly experimenting with extended reality devices, for a total of more than 80 projects across the company.

Last June we reported that Vancouver, Canada-based Precision OS signed up 10 North American universities and medical institutions, including The Mayo Clinic and McGill University, to provide surgical residents with high-fidelity virtual reality orthopedic surgery training systems.

Precision OS is also collaborating with John Costouros, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon and assistant professor at Stanford University, to trial virtual reality in training soon-to-be graduating surgeons.

Just last December we reported on an Orthopaedic Crossfire® simulation training debate where Kenneth A. Gustke, M.D., of the Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida, stated the advantage of simulation training “is that you’re able to learn new skills with no impact on patient care. You can practice as often as you want. You have no time pressures. You can make mistakes and you get feedback. You can also improve your performance prior to actually working on patients. These also can be adjusted for fidelity so that the skill level of the learner can be appropriate for that particular training.”

“The classic example of a simulator—a flight simulator—there’s no pilot in the world that’s flown a plane without going through a simulator first. And they have to keep retraining on simulators.”

The purpose of the public workshop, according to the FDA announcement, “is to discuss evaluation techniques for hardware, standards development, and assessment challenges for applications of Extended Reality (XR) in medicine. The goal is to identify critical gaps that may impede medical XR device development, innovation, and to advance the evaluation of medical XR devices and applications, thus accelerating the development of safe and effective medical XR devices benefiting patients and healthcare.”

Advertisement

The meeting will be webcasted live and the archived link will be posted on the website for viewing after the workshop. Click here to get all the information you need to see the webcast.

Registration

If you want to attend this workshop, you have to register by 4:00 p.m. on February 28, 2020. There is no fee to register for the workshop and registration will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Early registration is recommended because seating is limited.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy