LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/WhidbeyHealth Settles Age Discrimination Suit for $1.5 Million
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

WhidbeyHealth Settles Age Discrimination Suit for $1.5 Million

September 3, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

WhidbeyHealth Settles Age Discrimination Suit for $1.5 Million
Source: Pixabay/sasint
Secondary#agediscrimination#whidbeyhealth

Coupeville, Washington-based WhidbeyHealth has settled an age discrimination suit for $1.5 million. The hospital did not admit any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

James Elbaor, M.D., originally filed the age discrimination suit against WhidbeyHealth in U.S. District Court in March 2019, claiming that the hospital’s administrators denied his application to work for the hospital because of his age. Elbaor was 72 at the time he applied to the hospital.

Federal law prohibits discrimination against people who are age 40 and over.

Court records show that a former physician recruiter, the late Preston Moore, had recommended Elbaor to the hospital. Moore later contacted Elbaor and told him that the administrators had passed on him because of his age.

Moore wrote an affidavit stating that two hospital officials told him that they were trying to get rid of two older orthopedic surgeons and replace them with younger ones.

The hospital officials denied that they made those remarks. The hospital also noted that Moore left the hospital after the hospital officials realized that he had given fake Social Security number and lied about his criminal history in his application. The hospital noted that Moore also provided false information about Elbaor.

Officials said that they continued to consider Elbaor after they knew he was in his 70s. They say that the reasons that he was turned down were that they found that Elbaor had a sanction on his medical license, lost a large malpractice lawsuit, was disciplined at one hospital and placed on probation at another one.

The court documents also claim that some of the hospital’s administrators pressured surgeons to perform more surgeries in order to make the hospital more money. One orthopedic surgeon wrote an affidavit that detailed how a clinic manager “in particular tried to get me to perform more surgeries I did not feel were necessary or even medically indicated…She questioned my decisions about why I had not prescribed surgeries for individual patients.”

Advertisement

Elbaor received just over $1 million for compensatory damages according to the terms of the settlement.

In addition to settling the age discrimination lawsuit, WhidbeyHealth agreed to pay $38,000 to resolve a related public records violation. The hospital did not admit any wrongdoing in settling the cases.

Following the settlement, the hospital released a statement saying, “WhidbeyHealth vigorously denied, and continues to deny, engaging in any wrongdoing related to Dr. Elbaor or his attorney…These lawsuits were settled for business and practical reasons given the risks and burdens inherent in any litigation.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy