LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Treated vs. Untreated Depressed Patients, What Do We Really Know?
Large Joints and Extremities

Treated vs. Untreated Depressed Patients, What Do We Really Know?

September 13, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Treated vs. Untreated Depressed Patients, What Do We Really Know?
Source: Wikimedia Commons
#totaljointarthroplastySecondary#depression#shortformhealthsurvey

How do treated and untreated depressed patients fare after total joint arthroplasty (TJA)? This is what a team of multicenter researchers set out to determine.

Their work, “Depression Treatment Is Not Associated With Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty,” appears in the August 9, 2019 edition of The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Co-author Mohamad Halawi, M.D., assistant professor of orthopaedic surgery at the University of Connecticut explained the genesis of this study to OTW, “It is estimated that one out of four patients undergoing hip and knee replacement has history of clinical diagnosis of depression.”

“While the negative impact of depression on postoperative outcomes is well established, up until today, it was unclear whether pharmacological treatment could mitigate this negative effect. Most studies on this topic recommended patient counseling and ‘optimization’ yet stopped short of defining optimization.”

“We only assessed pharmacological treatment, which was variable per patient, but mostly involved the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Alternative modalities, such as behavioral therapy, were not assessed.”

To find answers, Dr. Halawi and his team enrolled patients who had received primary, elective, unilateral total joint arthroplasty and then divided the subjects into three groups based on a self-reported history of depression and treatment at the time of surgery.

The research team found that 25% of the patients in their study had experienced depression. Compared to patients with depression, untreated patients had a lower baseline SF-12 MSC (Short Form Health Survey), a measure of health-related quality of life and were more likely to have Medicaid insurance.

The authors wrote, “After controlling for potential confounding factors, there were no differences in either the absolute scores or net changes in any of the assessed outcomes at 12 months postoperatively among depressed patients regardless of the treatment…”

Advertisement

Dr. Halawi explained the results of the study to OTW, “There is a clear link between depression and a lower perception of improvement after joint replacement surgery even with in those patients who received pharmacological treatment. The picture is not all pessimistic, however. Drawing on the current study and our previous work, patients with depression but good mental health—reflecting compensated biopsychosocial functioning—do just as well as patients without depression. Resilience and support are perhaps key ingredients to achieving good mental health.”

“Future work should explore the role of biopsychosocial approach, as opposed to pharmacological treatment alone, in patients with depression undergoing total joint replacement.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy