LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/IV Acetaminophen vs Opioids: Updated Data
Large Joints and Extremities

IV Acetaminophen vs Opioids: Updated Data

August 22, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

IV Acetaminophen vs Opioids: Updated Data
Courtesy of the U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Sheila deVera
#postoperativepain#totalkneearthroplastySecondary#acetaminophen

Co-author Joseph Bosco, M.D., professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and director of Quality and Patient Safety at the NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, also vice chair for Clinical Affairs in the Department of Orthopaedic Medicine, has been at the forefront of improved pain management for a long time and explained the genesis of this study (“Evolution of an Opioid Sparse Pain Management Program for TKA with the Addition of Intravenous Acetaminophen” published in the August issue of The Journal of Arthroplasty) to OTW. “Our patients’ pain levels temporarily spiked immediately after their spinal anesthetic wore off and before the peri-articular block with liposomal bupivacaine began to take effect. This usually occurred in our post-operative Care Unit. The use of IV acetaminophen addressed this issue.”

To put some numbers behind the anecdotal evidence, Bosco and his team organized a study which compared two multi-modal analgesia protocols in patients who underwent primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The team collected data from 698 patients who received oral acetaminophen (OA) preoperatively, and on an as-needed basis. They also collected data from 318 patients who’d received two doses of IV acetaminophen (IA)—one intraoperative and one six hours postoperatively (no oral acetaminophen).

The researchers found that patients who’d received IV acetaminophen group demonstrated less narcotic usage on POD0 (OA: 13.3 mme; IA: 6.2 mme) and overall usage (OA: 66.1 mme; IA: 48.5 mme). They also documented that the patient’s pain scores were statistically and clinically lower in the immediate postoperative (the first 8 hours) for the IA group (OA: PRPS of 4.0; IA: PRPS of 2.0).

Finally, Bosco and his team report that both patient groups completed their physical therapy similarly for each postoperative day and length of stay and percent discharge home were slightly improved in the IA group although the difference did not reach a level which was statistically significant.

Dr. Bosco summarized his findings for OTW, “At NYU Langone Orthopedics we routinely spend time counseling our patients regarding post-operative pain. Our patients find this to be quite valuable. We tell them to expect a certain amount of pain in the post-operative period and let them know that we have ways of addressing this pain. We warn them that when the short acting spinal anesthetic wears off, they may experience discomfort before the peri-articular injection starts to work. That is why we are using the IV acetaminophen.”

“As a result of our experience with Medicare total joint bundled payment program, we transformed NYU Langone Orthopedics into a leader in value-based care. As is demonstrated in our study, the additional cost of IV acetaminophen is more than made up for by the pain relief and enhanced functional recovery it provides. It is another step in our constantly evolving multi-modal post-operative pain pathways.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy