LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/icotec AG’s Pedicle Systems for Spine Tumor Patients Cleared
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

icotec AG’s Pedicle Systems for Spine Tumor Patients Cleared

July 19, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

icotec AG’s Pedicle Systems for Spine Tumor Patients Cleared
VADER®one Pedicle System MIS and LightMore® Pedicle System 6.0 / Courtesy of icotec AG
Secondary

Swiss-based icotec AG’s Carbon/PEEK minimally invasive and open spine pedicle systems have been granted FDA 510(k) clearance.

According to FDA documents, the systems, called VADER®one Pedicle System MIS and LightMore® Pedicle System 6.0, are intended to “restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the thoracic and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.”

Both systems are manufactured using the company’s proprietary BlackArmor® Carbon/PEEK manufacturing process and are comprised of polyaxial pedicle screws and curved, straight and J-rods. Both can be used for single or multiple level fixations in the non-cervical spine. Carbon/PEEK is identical to CFRP (carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone).

In a July 8, 2019 press release, the company noted a recently published study by the neurosurgery and radiation oncology group from Technical University of Munich, Germany, stated, “In terms of postoperative evaluation of residual or recurrent tumor within the periphery of the spinal canal and column and for accurate radiation planning, CFRP implants hold major advantages when compared with standard titanium implants by generating significantly fewer image artifacts.”

The company says its material is produced using icotec’s injection molding CFM (composite flow molding) manufacturing technology. “This process allows for 3-dimensionally reinforced, nonmetallic implants providing both, the strength and radiolucency needed for oncology patients and their treatment.”

Radiolucent CFRP Composite

According to the company, it is the only company manufacturing spinal implants made of radiolucent CFRP composite material. The implants are “biocompatible and have been successfully implanted for over 15 years. Their X-ray, CT and MRI translucency makes a significant difference during the surgical procedure, and postoperatively in assessing the site of care. In patients with spinal tumors, optimal delineation of the tumor from healthy tissue can facilitate radiotherapy planning, improve radiosurgery treatment and allow immediate and precise monitoring of possible relapses (tumor recurrence).”

Company CEO Roger Stadler said the ability to use icotec’s material for stabilizing the spine, “offers advanced-stage tumor patients the ability to consider a larger variety of treatment options with improved therapy planning, dose delivery and follow-up evaluation.”

It took the FDA about four months to clear the devices.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy