LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Are Gadolinium Enhanced MRI’s Unreliable?
Spine

Are Gadolinium Enhanced MRI’s Unreliable?

June 28, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Are Gadolinium Enhanced MRI’s Unreliable?
Gadolinium enhanced MRI to Investigate Back Pain / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Dr. Laughlin Dawes
Secondary#discinflammation#gadoliniumenhancement

Should you believe your eyes when a gadolinium enhanced MRI shows disc inflammation? Maybe not, says new work from the Netherlands.

The study, “Gadolinium Enhancement Is Not Associated With Disc Inflammation in Patients With Sciatica,” was published in the June 15, 2019 edition of Spine.

Niek Djuric, M.D., with the Department of Neurosurgery at the Leiden University Medical Center in The Netherlands and study co-author explained his thinking behind the study to OTW, “Gadolinium enhancement is a commonly used tool to assess the degree of inflammation, especially in pathologies of the brain. This has led to the assumption that gadolinium can also be used to illustrate inflammation of the herniated disc.”

“However, since the inflammation response of the disc is usually rather limited, it can often be hard to interpret the enhancement of the images. Hence we started to question the reliability of this imaging technique.”

To test their hypothesis, the study investigators retrieved disc tissue from 119 patients in their sciatica trial. The investigators were from several centers and they organized the study to be a randomized controlled trial. After harvesting disc tissue, the researchers embedded the tissue in paraffin and stained it with hematoxylin and CD68. They then categorized their tissue samples as having either mild, moderate, or considerable inflammation. Finally, in order to test the efficacy of gadolinium, the research team employed gadolinium contrast media to 96 of the 119 MRIs.

The team found that 74 of the patients showed gadolinium enhancement of the disc herniation and 26 of the nerve root.

Dr. Djuric dissected the study results for OTW, “Gadolinium enhancement of disc was not associated with the degree of inflammation by macrophages. Macrophages play an important role in the resorption of the herniated disc. So, patients with a higher degree of macrophage infiltration may be more likely to benefit from prolonged conservative treatment since their herniated discs will be resorbed faster, leading to a spontaneous relief of their symptoms. A noninvasive tool to assess macrophage infiltration can thus be valuable for deciding to go for surgery or for prolonged conservative treatment. Our results question whether gadolinium is the right tool for this important decision and indicate that we may want to look for a different tool.”

“For those who use gadolinium for clinical decisions, we suggest that they reevaluate its effectiveness in predicting disc inflammation.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy