LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/People In The News/L. Andrew Koman, M.D. Receives OREF Award
People In The News

L. Andrew Koman, M.D. Receives OREF Award

May 8, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

L. Andrew Koman, M.D. Receives OREF Award
L. Andrew Koman, M.D.
#cerebralpalsy#landrewkoman#orefaward

L. Andrew Koman, M.D. was recently awarded the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (OREF) Clinical Research Award the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Dr. Koman, along with co-authors Beth Paterson Smith, Ph.D., and Thomas L. Smith, Ph.D., studied the impact of botulinum toxins on the musculoskeletal system over the past 30 years, defining its pharmacologic properties and documenting its positive value in patients with cerebral palsy.

In 1988, Dr. Koman and Dr. Beth Smith were the first to inject botulinum A toxin—a naturally-occurring poisonous substance—to stabilize muscle imbalance in children with cerebral palsy. They found that botulinum toxins improved function for cerebral palsy patients.

“For severe patients, it facilitates their care and makes it easier for their caregivers to help them,” said Dr. Koman, professor and chair of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

“For patients with upper body functional impairment and mobility challenges, it was easier to get their clothes on and off, to raise their arms, and to get them in and out of wheelchairs. For less severe patients, it was easier for them to walk and it decreased pain. Using botulinum toxin delayed surgery, a significant amount of time, decreased hospitalizations, improved the quality of life for patients, and it is cost effective.”

Dr. Koman and his colleagues built a multidisciplinary lab that conducted over 110 pre-clinical and clinical trials and established a database with more than 25,000 patient years of data. This information allowed researchers to look at factors as the cost impact of botulinum use and caregiver stress associated with the level of severity of cerebral palsy.

“If used appropriately with the right dilution and the right number of units, it is a very safe drug,” said Dr. Koman. “In the randomized, controlled trials, the patients who received placebo had more pain than the patients who had toxins. We found that by increasing the volume, we can decrease the amount of toxin, which makes it safer and less expensive, but we get the same efficacy.”

Asked for details on the challenges involved in defining the pharmacologic properties of botulinum A toxin, Dr. Koman told OTW, “In order to define the neuromuscular junction [NMJ] subtype properties required the development of a model and research protocols we had to do anatomic studies to determine the NMJ distribution. The most important clinical pharmacologic properties were the time activity curves or the length of time the drug worked and its expected decreased effect for weakness—this required a model and protocols. Also crucial was the effect of dilution which required a model and protocols.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy