LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Artoss Adds Posterolateral Fusion Indication for NanoBone SBX
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Artoss Adds Posterolateral Fusion Indication for NanoBone SBX

May 10, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Artoss Adds Posterolateral Fusion Indication for NanoBone SBX
NanoBone QD Applicator / Courtesy of Artoss, Inc.
#backpain#spinesurgerySecondary#fusion#bonegraft

Artoss, Inc. has received clearance from the FDA to add a posterolateral fusion indication and an alternate applicator to its previously cleared NanoBone bone graft substitute.

On April 23, 2019, after a three-month review, the agency granted clearance to the company’s NanoBone SBX Putty for standalone use in posterolateral spinal fusion.

Indications

According to FDA documents, the SBX Putty is an implant intended to “fill bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., extremities, posterolateral spine and pelvis). These osseous defects are surgically created or the result of traumatic injury to the bone and are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure. NanoBone SBX Putty resorbs and is replaced with bone during the healing process.”

NanoBone Putty

The putty consists of NanoBone granulate embedded in an aqueous gel. NanoBone granulate, state the FDA documents, “consists of phase-pure non-sintered nanocrystalline osteoconductive hydroxyapatite (HA) embedded in a highly porous silica gel matrix. The high porosity of the product includes nano pores, micro pores, and macro pores. The interconnected and open porous structure of the macro pores of the NanoBone is similar to human cancellous bone. NanoBone® SBX Putty does not set in-situ following implantation.”

The material is supplied in two different style applicators. The SBX Putty is supplied in a sterile applicator with an attached plunger. NanoBone QD is an alternate packaging of the NanoBone SBX Putty and is supplied in a sterile cartridge with a separate sterile plunger.

Jim Cassidy, Ph.D., Artoss’ managing director, told OTW that in order to secure the indication for use as a standalone graft in posterolateral spinal fusion, “NanoBone SBX Putty was tested against iliac crest autograft in the ASTM standard animal model that is designed to replicate clinical relevant fusion rates and found to be equivalent. A majority of bone void fillers must be mixed with autograft in order to achieve equivalent fusion rates to autograft. By eliminating the need to mix with autograft or bone marrow aspirate, NanoBone can offer significant cost savings to hospitals and streamline procedures in the operating room.”

Advertisement

J. Eric Gee, M.D., said using the putty as a standalone in posterolateral spinal fusion, “represents a significant advancement in patient care. Eliminating the need to mix synthetic graft with autograft or to harvest and concentrate bone marrow aspirate will save time and money as well as streamline operating room procedures.”

The company says its products have been used in Europe and the U.S. for more than ten years in more than 100,000 clinical cases across all indications. They have been available in the U.S. through Artoss, Inc. since 2015.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy