LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Is Modular Dual Mobility Viable for Young Patients?
Large Joints and Extremities

Is Modular Dual Mobility Viable for Young Patients?

April 22, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Is Modular Dual Mobility Viable for Young Patients?
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Matthew Chlosta
#totalhiparthroplastySecondary#modulardualmobilityacetabulum#taperedfemoralstem

New research from Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois and Washington University Orthopedics, Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri has examined the issue of using modular dual mobility (DM) prostheses in young, active patients.

The study, “Is a modular dual mobility acetabulum a viable option for the young, active total hip arthroplasty patient?” appears in the March 31, 2019 edition of The Bone and Joint Journal.

Denis Nam, M.D., M.Sc., associate professor of orthopedic surgery at Rush and study co-author explained to OTW the purpose behind this new study. “The use of modular dual mobility prostheses has increased in popularity, especially in patients deemed to be at higher risk of instability. However, little data is present assessing their performance in younger, more active patients.”

“Concerns regarding the potential for corrosion between the cobalt-chromium liner and titanium acetabular component have been reported, thus we analyzed whole blood metal ion levels in these patients from preoperatively to 1- and 2-years postoperatively.”

The researchers undertook a prospective study of patients between 18 and 65 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2 and a University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score > 6, all of whom received a modular cobalt-chromium acetabular liner, highly crosslinked polyethylene mobile bearing, and cementless titanium femoral stem for their primary THA [total hip arthroplasty].

According to Dr. Nam, “The most important finding was that overall, this prostheses combination is performing well at 2-years postoperatively in our small cohort of patients. However, it is important to note that 5 patients at 1-year postoperatively had a whole blood cobalt level above the reference range, and 4 patients at 2-years postoperatively had a whole blood cobalt level above the reference range.”

“Of these four patients, 3 had an inner ceramic femoral head and thus the presumed source of cobalt is from the modular, acetabular liner. However, at 2-years postoperatively, the maximum cobalt level was 0.94 ug/L which was actually less than was seen at 1-year postoperatively. Continued surveillance is mandatory to evaluate this bearing combination both for potential corrosion and wear performance moving forward.”

“This study certainly has its limitations and larger, prospective cohorts are necessary to corroborate these results. However, this study demonstrates that use of a modular, dual mobility prosthesis and cementless, tapered femoral stem has shown encouraging results even in a younger, active cohort of patients. Thus, our results justify both continued surveillance of this cohort and also future studies examining its performance in larger cohorts of patients.”

“In our opinion, this study shows encouraging results of a specific modular, dual mobility implant. However, it is important for surgeons to recognize the limitations of our investigation and that this is only a small cohort of patients at short follow-up. We would recommend further, prospective investigations demonstrating excellent long-term outcomes before recommending its widespread use in a younger, active population of patients.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy