LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Proposes to Update Inspection Protocols
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Proposes to Update Inspection Protocols

April 18, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Proposes to Update Inspection Protocols
Source: drughealth.blogspot.com
Secondary#draftguidance#fdainspections#inspections

Between 2007 and 2017, there was a 243% increase in the annual number of foreign device inspections and a 46% increase in domestic inspections, reports the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).

Therefore, on March 29, 2019, the agency issued a draft guidance to implement uniform processes and standards for those inspections.

In February, the agency issued a draft guidance to identify a new standardized mechanism for device establishments to request nonbinding feedback on actions proposed to address FDA Form 483 observations. The guidances were required by the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017.

The agency reviewed its current procedures as of August 18, 2017. The review encompassed FDA guidances, manuals, programs, and internal standard operating procedures related to medical device establishment inspections.

As a result of the review, FDA identified uniform processes and standards and drafted revisions to procedural documents, including the Investigations Operations Manual and training materials to align with these processes and standards.

The draft guidance describes standardized methods of communication during the inspection process and identifies practices for investigators and device establishments to facilitate the continuity of inspections of such establishments.

The updates provide exceptions to existing processes and standards, an estimated timeframe for an inspection process and advanced notices of some records that will be requested from the establishment at the time of the inspection.

The agency’s March 2018 annual report noted the median time between an FDA inspection request to the start of an inspection of a device establishment is 35 days.

Advertisement

The agency’s inspections can range from three to six continuous business days, though factors such as the nature of FDA-observed deficiencies can impact inspection duration and extensions may be needed under certain situations.

With the uniform processes and standards, the agency will pre-announce a domestic inspection generally within five calendar days. For foreign inspections, this may be delayed due to countries’ clearances requirements. FDA investigators, “when time and circumstances permit,” are to “make every reasonable effort to discuss all observations with the management of the establishment as they are observed, or on a daily basis, to minimize errors and misunderstandings.”

Sixty-Day Comment Period

This is only a draft. The agency wants your comments by the end of May.

Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, Maryland, 20852.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy