LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Predictors of Osteoarthritis After ACL Repair
Large Joints and Extremities

Predictors of Osteoarthritis After ACL Repair

March 8, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Predictors of Osteoarthritis After ACL Repair
An X-ray of the left knee showed severe osteoarthritis with evident lateral joint space / Courtesy of Research Gate
#osteoarthritis#anteriorcruciateligamentSecondary

In a study of 147 patients in Sweden, researchers found that older persons who have waited >1 year between injury and reconstruction may require extra postop attention.

The study, “Preoperative and Intraoperative Predictors of Long-Term Acceptable Knee Function and Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis Based on 2 Randomized Controlled Trials,” appears in the February 2019 edition of Arthroscopy.

Eric Hamrin Senorski, P.T., Ph.D., M.Sc., with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, explained the rationale behind the study to OTW, “Our primary rationale was to determine predictors/risk factors for long-term knee function, both in terms of development of osteoarthritis and acceptable patient-perceived knee function.”

“Understanding what patients will (or have a better chance) fare well and who will end up with a suboptimal outcome is very important for decision-making and expectation setting in clinic. Our study is a small step in getting closer to an individualized treatment after ACL [anterior cruciate ligament] injury.”

“This study is a long-term follow-up of two previous randomized controlled trials of 193 patients who underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral hamstring tendon or patellar tendon autografts. Patients who suffered multiligament injuries, major meniscal injuries, chondral lesions requiring surgical treatment, or had a previous ACL reconstruction were excluded.”

Dr. Senorski discussed the study’s findings with OTW, “Not surprisingly, patients who were older at the time of ACL reconstruction and had waited >1 year between the injury and reconstruction ran an increased risk of having osteoarthritis 16 years after reconstruction. One in two patients reported acceptable long-term knee function, but no risk factor for poorer patient perceived (non-acceptable) knee function was identified. Interestingly, in the 50% of the patients who reported acceptable knee function at on average 16 year after ACL reconstruction, one-third had developed osteoarthritis.”

“On the basis of the results of the present study, clinicians should be aware that patients who undergo ACL surgery at an older age and have waited >1 year between injury and reconstruction may require additional attention during rehabilitation and help setting realistic future expectations, considering the increased risk of developing osteoarthritis. In addition, it appears necessary to suggest that short-term postoperative outcomes should also be included when helping patients to set expectations for long-term knee function.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy