LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/This Government Shutdown Is Really Hurting the FDA
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

This Government Shutdown Is Really Hurting the FDA

January 21, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

This Government Shutdown Is Really Hurting the FDA
FDA Headquarters / Photo creation by RRY Publications and FDA
#fdaSecondary#medicaldevices#governmentshutdown

It’s now the longest partial FDA and government shutdown in history.

As we write these words, the agency has about three weeks of funding left to review new drug applications.

For the devices, the cash flow burn rate of user fees already collected gives the agency about three months of funding to review and process device applications.

Calling the shutdown “the most significant operational challenges in the agency’s history,” FDA head Dr. Scott Gottlieb has had to send more than 7,000 or 40% of his workforce home.

In mid-January Gottlieb recalled 400 workers to support inspections. But not pay them.

Approximately 100 of those 400 will focus on inspections of high-risk medical device manufacturing facilities, with an additional 90 employees focused on high risk biological manufacturing facilities, Gottlieb said. An additional 70 employees will focus on high risk drug manufacturing facilities.

He noted the FDA staffers are expected to work unpaid to perform work that is “necessary to identify and responds to threats to safety of human life.”

A week earlier Gottlieb said he had been forced to cut back on non-urgent activities to meet FDA’s consumer protection mandate. So far, the agency has been living on user fee cash from fiscal 2018. But the agency is not allowed to accept new user fees until the shutdown is over.

Advertisement

“We’re shifting operating dollars to payroll dollars in order to maximize our runway and preserve program functions,” stated Gottlieb.

Some of the activities that will have to be performed by unpaid staffers include an expansion of inspection activities beyond “for cause” inspections to also include “foreign and domestic food, drug, medical, device and pharmacy compounding surveillance inspections focused on the highest risk products and facilities.”

Also, on that list is “expanded monitoring and evaluating medical device adverse event and malfunction reports to include additional types of medical devices.”

Gottlieb tweeted: “Many key functions aren’t getting done…but we’re focused on maintaining core activities that directly impact consumer safety and save lives. My priority is to our consumer protection mission and the people executing mission critical functions.”

Some Democratic senators sent a letter to Gottlieb expressing their concern that the shutdown will halt “vital regulatory and compliance activities” and could result in slower approvals for drugs and devices—and a backlog when the shutdown ends.

According to a STAT analysis of upcoming regulatory decisions, the shutdown could soon jeopardize anticipated new drugs from Janssen, Sanofi and Novartis for depression, diabetes and multiple sclerosis, as well as a host of other potential new therapies.

We’ve reached out to device company lawyers and representatives to alert us when device companies experience significant problems. We’ll keep you posted.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy