LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Bone Panel Supports Amgen Osteoporosis Drug
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Bone Panel Supports Amgen Osteoporosis Drug

January 24, 2019 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Bone Panel Supports Amgen Osteoporosis Drug
Source: Melbourne Osteopathy Centre
#backpain#fdaSecondary#amgen

On January 16, 2019, by a vote of 18-1, the FDA’s bone, reproductive and urologic drugs advisory committee (BRUDAC) recommended that the FDA approve Amgen and UCB (Euronext Brussels)’s Evenity (romosozumab) osteoporosis treatment.

The lone dissent came from the committee’s patient representative.

It was the second review for the companies and came after the agency issued a Complete Response Letter in July 2017 for the Biologics License Application (BLA) for the Evenity injection. The agency’s response proposed a narrower indication of treatment for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The companies then resubmitted their application.

The committee voted in favor of that resubmission. Because there was a concern by committee members about the lack of data to analyze potential cardiovascular risk, the indication was further limited for the “treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture, defined as history in osteoporotic fracture, multiple risk factors for fracture, or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy.”

A majority of the committee members recommended the companies conduct a post-approval study to obtain real-world data in a clinical setting. According to a report by RAPS, other committee members said it would be impossible to conduct such a post-approval study due to challenges with enrollment in clinical settings.

Evenity

According to the briefing materials supplied to committee members by Amgen, romosozumab is a “humanized monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G2) that inhibits sclerostin, thus having the dual protective action of promoting bone formation and decreasing bone resorption.”

The company said its BLA included data from approximately 14,000 subjects in 19 studies of the romosozumab clinical program.

Advertisement

The pivotal trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Subjects were randomized to 12 months of romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab or to 12 months of placebo followed by 12 months of denosumab. “Romosozumab significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fracture by 73% through month 12 and by 75% through month 24 (coprimary efficacy endpoints),” according to the company.

Click here for the 110-page Amgen committee materials.

Committee members are M.D.s with expertise in obstetrics, gynecology, epidemiology, urology, and geriatric medicine. Only one, Matthew Drake, M.D., Ph.D., from the Mayo Clinic reports expertise in bone disease.

David Reese, Amgen’s head of research and development, said, “women who are at high risk for fracture could benefit from an additional treatment option that has the potential to both build new bone and slow existing bone loss.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy