LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/University of Toledo Professor Petitions FDA for Reprocessing Ban
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

University of Toledo Professor Petitions FDA for Reprocessing Ban

December 11, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

University of Toledo Professor Petitions FDA for Reprocessing Ban
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Rosiane Andrade da Costa and the FDA
#fdaSecondary#pediclescrews#contaminated

A University of Toledo professor has petitioned the FDA to ban the reprocessing of pedicle screws and other implantable orthopedic devices.

OTW recently covered the results of multicenter research studies that proposed a superior standard of care and method of delivery that completely eliminated contamination in pedicle screws: Are Your Sterile Implants Really Sterile?

Following the studies, lead researcher Aakash Agarwal, Ph.D., filed a petition with the Food and Drug Administration requesting that the Commissioner of Food and Drugs cease clearing 510(k)s and approving premarket approvals (PMA) for reprocessing of pedicle screws and other implantable orthopedic devices and cease clearing 510(k)s for reusable implantable orthopedic devices.

In the petition, Agarwal highlighted that pedicle screws are being contaminated in two different ways:

First, they undergo repeated bulk-cleaning with dirty instruments from the OR, leading to residue build up at the interfaces and possibly on the surfaces. Due to its concealed nature, this remains unnoticed by the Sterile Processing Department or other hospital staff. Agarwal noted that this type of contamination can be avoided by using a single-use pre-sterilized screws.

The second way that pedicle screws are being contaminated is intraoperatively. Sterile pedicle screw shafts are directly touched by the scrub tech with soiled gloves for loading onto an insertion device. They are then kept exposed on the working table.

A multicenter trial has shown that by the time it is implanted in the patient, it can harbor up to 10e7 bacterial colony forming units. Agarwal noted that use of a functional impermeable sterile-guard around the sterile-implant, which shields the pedicle screws intraoperatively until it is implanted into the patient, resulted in zero contamination. This would be an effective precautionary measure against possible surgical site infection (SSI) or subclinical and chronic sepsis leading to screw loosening and pain.

This could become a major safety initiative undertaken by FDA in upcoming years concerning the handling and delivery of orthopedic implants. It may be prudent for orthopedic device manufacturers to start the remediation process now to avoid delay in future, i.e., by addressing this gap in their quality system, before the FDA gets intimately involved in this initiative.

The FDA Office of the Executive Secretariat acknowledged receipt of the letter and assigned it docket number FDA-2018-P-4143 for future reference.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy