LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/The EPIC Problem With the CDC Opioid Guideline
Spine

The EPIC Problem With the CDC Opioid Guideline

November 21, 2018 3 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

The EPIC Problem With the CDC Opioid Guideline
Epic, leading electronic health record vendor / Source: Epic
#opioidSecondary#opioidguidelines#epic

When the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published its opioid-prescribing guideline in 2016, it became a de facto national standard, almost as if it were a government regulation.

Why? There was no other standard or guideline. And federal drug enforcers spy on prescribing patterns in state prescription drug management programs (PDMPs).

However, the CDC guideline has been criticized for being a one-duration-fits-all standard and for not addressing varying per-day dosage needs.

In response, CDC said its guideline was merely a guideline, not a rule.

Everyone else still sees it as “the” rule. Many states passed laws setting seven days (see below) as the maximum for an opioid prescription—or five, in the case of New Jersey, whose then-governor, Chris Christie, bathed in national headlines by pushing the “toughest” opioid law through the state legislature.

Baking a Guidelineinto EHR systems

Electronic health record (EHR) systems are also an issue, says a Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM) study published online in August and in the October issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons:

They “often have arbitrarily set prescribing defaults that are not procedure specific. The recommendations presented (in the JHM study) can be used to create smarter defaults. Changing the default is 1 easy step to aide prescribers who are overprescribing. Indeed, next steps at our institution include hospital-wide electronic medical record changes in the default number of opioid tablets to prescribe and ease of access to published guidelines within a patient’s chart.”

Advertisement

Johns Hopkins uses the Epic Systems Corporation’s EHR. More than 200 million patients are treated by caregivers using Epic software, Epic says on its website. A JHM page, “Why Epic?” says Epic is used by more than 250 health care organizations serving 47% of the U.S. population.

The JHM critique wasn’t aimed specifically at Epic. Its point was that the CDC’s 2016 first-draft guideline is written into EHRs as the easiest way for a physician to write an opioid prescription, and that it’s too high in most cases.

We asked Epic about its default opioid prescribing settings. A company spokesperson wrote back, “In Epic’s Foundation System, the defaults are set based on CDC guidelines—5 day supply for adults, 3 days for children…Our defaults have been updated in response to the CDC guidelines…We have a utility customers can run to find meds in preference lists and SmartSets*with high default duration and pill count so they can identify those that need to be updated.”

*A preference list is a list which allows a physician to select a single order from a set of standard orders. A SmartSet is a “group of orders and other elements, such as notes, chief complaints…and levels of service, that are commonly used together to document a specific type of visit.”

In both preference lists and SmartSets, “Having the pain medication prescription…configured with a specific number of pain pills makes it efficient for the provider to sign the orders and go. A number of Epic hospitals have found that configuring this Order Set for smaller quantities of pills will effectively reduce the number of pills dispensed,” the Epic spokesperson said.

Asked if Epic is considering changes in light of the JHM study, the spokesperson said, “Our emphasis is on standardizing default settings” and “We are looking at procedure-specific limits, but our emphasis is on setting defaults lower as recommended by CDC guidelines. We are also looking at how to help users prescribe appropriately based on the last 24 hours prior to discharge.”

“Additional note: Epic provides multiple layers of decision support above and beyond setting defaults in order sets and preference lists. Users are presented warnings for dosing, co-existing medical conditions, medication interactions, and patient-specific risk factors to further inform clinical decision making,” the Epic spokesperson said.

CDC guideline is confusing, actually; it only sort-of says five days

Advertisement

If you scroll down to recommendation #6 of the CDC guideline, the boldfaced sentence and the next two paragraphs say that often, less than a three-day supply of opioids is needed, and only rarely is a prescription needed for longer than seven…but maybe five, and some of the cited experts say fewer than 14 days.

Epic saw all those numbers, and a committee chose five days as a conservative maximum.

Is the CDC guideline embedded in other EHRs? We’ve sent queries to several vendors.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy