LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/New Study: Lumbar Decompression=Reduced Opioid Use
Spine

New Study: Lumbar Decompression=Reduced Opioid Use

November 29, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Study: Lumbar Decompression=Reduced Opioid Use
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Deviation56 at English Wikipedia
#opioidSecondary#lumbarspinalstenosis#Interspinousprocessdecompression

A new multicenter study has found that using interspinous process decompression (IPD) to treat painful lumbar spinal stenosis can reduce the need for opioid medications in patients.

The work, “Interspinous process decompression is associated with a reduction in opioid analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis,” appears in the November 20, 2018 edition of the Journal of Pain Research.

Co-author Pierce D. Nunley, M.D. director of the Spine Institute of Louisiana in Shreveport, Louisiana, and associate professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, explained the purpose of the study to OTW, “With the heightened awareness of the current opioid crisis it is important to evaluate all the ways we can have a positive impact.”

“It was obvious to me that surgery can decrease dependence on opioids and pain medications. With that thesis we looked at the data in the Superion trial to see if the procedure resulted in decrease usage of narcotics.

The authors wrote: “This study estimated the type, dosage, and duration of opioid medications through 5 years of follow-up after IPD with the Superion Indirect Decompression System (Vertiflex Inc., Carlsbad, CA USA). Data were obtained from the Superion-treatment arm of a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. The prevalence of subjects using opiates was determined at baseline through 60 months. Primary analysis included all 190 patients randomized to receive the Superion device. In a subgroup of 98 subjects, we determined opioid-medication prevalence among subjects with a history of opioid use.”

Dr. Nunley commented to OTW, “The data analysis demonstrated that the use of Superion in this study did result in a decrease of opioid usage. The interesting point of this study is this was a retrospective review of a prospective Level I study conducted and completed well before the awareness of the opioid crisis.”

“Most surgeons do not know about Superion and IPD because of the history of varied results. It takes time to get the data out there and for surgeons to become aware of the technology. There have also been some coding and reimbursement issues that have largely been solved that surgeons are not aware. Availability for ASCs [ambulatory surgery centers] may prove to be a pathway to greater awareness.”

“The first practical recommendation from this work is we need to start thinking about surgery as a benefit to patients in their quality of life and particularly the positive impact surgery can have on combating the opioid crisis. More specifically, in the present study, the Superion procedure has demonstrated decrease utilization of opioids in this study population.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy