LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Clears Smaller Spinal Implants for Kids
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Clears Smaller Spinal Implants for Kids

November 1, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Clears Smaller Spinal Implants for Kids
Response Spine System / Courtesy of OrthoPediatrics Corp.
#spinesurgerySecondary#scoliosis#pediatricorthopetics

In pediatrics, smaller is usually better, especially when it comes to treating complex scoliosis cases.

On October 19, 2018, OrthoPediatrics Corp. of Warsaw, Indiana, announced FDA clearance for the Response 4.5/5.0mm spine system for younger patients with a smaller stature. It is the company’s 26th surgical system. The FDA determined the system was substantial equivalent to the company’s previously cleared Response 5.5/6.0 system.

According to the FDA, the system is intended for “immobilization and stabilization of the posterior, non-cervical spine in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, or lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, and/or failed previous fusion.”

When used for posterior non-cervical pedicle screw fixation in pediatric patients, the implants are indicated as an adjunct to fusion to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and intended to be used with autograft and/or allograft. Pediatric pedicle screw fixation is limited to a posterior approach.

The company says the system features advanced instrument & implant technology, including:

  • innovative, low profile screw design including a proprietary set screw thread design for improved fixation and reduced potential for cross threading, and
  • unique pedicle screw head accepts a 5.5mm or 6.0mm rod in both cobalt chrome and titanium.

Additionally, the system has, “versatile reduction & de-rotation capabilities with rod reducer instrument designed for easy snap on and off 2-in-1 rod reduction instrument enables each surgeon to perform reduction and de-rotation technique of choice and serves as a rod reducer and de-rotator in one.”

David Bailey, the company’s executive vice president, said the system allows physicians to better treat smaller statures and patients at a younger age. “Our engineering teams have been diligently working with a prominent group of surgeons, and we are excited to bring their innovative vision to life with another surgical solution for treating complex pediatric scoliosis.”

St. Louis’ Shriners Hospital’s Chief of Staff, Scott Luhmann, M.D., said, “This surgeon-centric system is focused on surgical efficacy and efficiency with an elegant rod reduction tool that significantly cuts down laborious task time in the effort to provide optimal patient outcome.” Luhmann is also Associate Professor in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Fellowship Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery at Washington University School of Medicine

Advertisement

The system is expected to launch in the fourth quarter of 2018.

The company was founded 12 years ago in the orthopedic capital of the world, Warsaw, Indiana, and focuses solely on the pediatric orthopedic market. To date, it offers 25 surgical systems.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy