LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Vertos: MOTION Study of MIS Decompression Using Fitbits
Spine

Vertos: MOTION Study of MIS Decompression Using Fitbits

October 15, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Vertos: MOTION Study of MIS Decompression Using Fitbits
Courtesy of Vertos Medical Inc.
Secondary#vertosmedical#disabilityindex#oswestry

Vertos Medical Inc. has enrolled the first patient into its nationwide, multicenter study of its minimally invasive lumbar decompression (aka: mild®) procedure and will be using the popular device, Fitbit, to collect data.

According to the company, “The novel, prospective, randomized controlled study will use clinically validated, patient-reported outcome measures to identify improvements in pain and function, and will capture objective measures of participants’ activity levels using Fitbit activity trackers.”

The procedure being studied is an outpatient lumbar decompression procedure which treats the patient’s stenosis “… through a portal the size of a baby aspirin. The Vertos procedure “… requires no implants, no general anesthesia, no stitches, and no overnight hospital stay.”

The company’s study of this approach will follow patients who been treated with this mild® procedure for two years and, the company expects, “… will enroll patients 50-80 years of age and will provide important data to help physicians and patients make early treatment decisions for other LSS [lumbar spinal stenosis] sufferers.”

The study, which is branded the “MOTION Study” recently enrolled its first patient at the Michigan Interventional Pain Center in Brownstown, Michigan. The physician who will perform the inaugural mild® procedure was Razmig Haladjian, M.D., an interventional pain specialist.

“A major step forward in interventional pain occurred with the first patient enrolled in the MOTION Study, a level 1, prospective, randomized, multicenter study that evaluates subjective and objective functional measures,” said Dr. Tim Deer, an interventional pain specialist, president and CEO of The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias and national principal investigator for the MOTION Study.

“This important, activity-based study will generate evidence that further supports minimally invasive LSS treatments to improve patients’ quality of life and reduce the use of opioids,” added Dr. Deer.

Eric Wichems, president and CEO of Vertos Medical, told OTW, “The primary endpoint for the study is Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 months, which measures permanent functional disability using questions regarding activities of daily living (ADL), specifically disturbance in ADL related to chronic back pain.”

Advertisement

“Other measures include 6-month follow up on pain intensity, severity of symptoms, physical function characteristics, and patient’s satisfaction after treatment along with steps/walking distance measured by a Fitbit activity tracker and walking time. Consistent measures will be taken at timepoints leading up to study completion at two years.”

“The mild® procedure removes the root cause of neurogenic claudication, by debulking the ligamentum flavum, the major contributor to spinal canal narrowing. It is the clinically demonstrated safest decompression procedure with clinically proven effectiveness in patients with comorbidities. The mild® procedure has been performed on more than 20,000 patients and its safety and efficacy have been analyzed in more than 13 clinical studies and 20 publications.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy