LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/FDA Releases Medical Device Guidance for 2019
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

FDA Releases Medical Device Guidance for 2019

October 11, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Releases Medical Device Guidance for 2019
Photo creation by RRY Publications, LLC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration
#fdaSecondary#fdaguidance

What guidance can you expect from the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) for 2019? Risk-benefit determinations, unique device identification and 510(k) program expansions, to name a few. And now, they want to hear from you.

On October 5, 2018, the agency published three lists of guidance documents we can expect to see in the coming year. The lists are:

  • The “A List” of guidance documents that the agency fully intends to publish;
  • The “B List” of guidance documents that the agency intends to publish as resources permit; and,
  • Finally, a list of final guidance documents issued in 2009, 1999, 1989, and 1979 that are subject to focused retrospective review.

The “A List” includes:

  • Consideration of Uncertainty in Making Benefit-Risk Determinations in Medical Device Premarket Approvals, De Novo Classifications, and Humanitarian Device Exemptions
  • Unique Device Identification: Policy Regarding Compliance Dates for Class I and Unclassified Devices and
  • Direct Marking of Inventory
  • Breakthrough Devices Program
  • Expansion of the Abbreviated 510(k) Program: Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence through Performance Criteria
  • The Least Burdensome Provisions: Concept and Principles
  • Changes to Existing Medical Software Policies Resulting from Section 3060 of the 21st Century Cures Act
  • Clinical and Patient Decision Support Software
  • Multiple Function Device Products: Policy and Considerations
  • Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) Program
  • Requests for Feedback and Meetings for Medical Device Submissions: The Q-Submission Program
  • The Special 510(k) Program

The FDA Wants to Hear From You

The agency says it would appreciate comments on any or all the guidance documents on the three lists to docket FDA-2012-N-1021. Specifically, the FDA seeks comments on the relative priority of guidance documents. Comments could also include draft language on the proposed A-list and B-list topics, suggestions for new or different guidance documents, for which they request that commenters state the potential guidance topic, reasons the guidance is needed, and proposed policy or information for FDA to consider on the topic.

You should submit written comments to the Dockets Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with docket number FDA-2012-N-1021 for “Notice to Public of Website Location of CDRH Fiscal Year 2019 Proposed Guidance Development.” Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov.

To link to the FDA webpage for proposed guidance development information, click here.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy