LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Study: Delayed Hip Fracture Surgery Raises Costs
Large Joints and Extremities

Study: Delayed Hip Fracture Surgery Raises Costs

September 11, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Study: Delayed Hip Fracture Surgery Raises Costs
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Indian Navy
#hipfractureSecondary#hip#delayedsurgery

A recent study of nearly 42,230 Canadians has found that having hip fracture patients wait more than 24 hours for surgical treatment results in higher costs and longer hospital stays.

The study, “Medical Costs of Delayed Hip Fracture Surgery,” appears in the August 15, 2018 edition of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Co-author Daniel Pincus, M.D. is an orthopedic surgeon at the University of Toronto in Canada. “Many studies have found an association between waiting for hip fracture surgery and complications,” commented Dr. Pincus to OTW. “However, no research had previously compared medical costs of early and delayed hip fracture surgery.”

The authors wrote, “We conducted a population-based, propensity-matched cohort study of patients treated between 2009 and 2014 in Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was early hip fracture surgery, performed within 24 hours after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was direct medical costs, estimated for each patient in 2013 Canadian dollars, from the payer perspective.”

“The costs in the early and delayed groups were then compared using a difference-in-differences approach: the baseline cost in the year prior to the hip fracture that had been accrued by patients with early surgery was subtracted from the cost in the first year following the surgery (first difference), and the difference was then compared with the same difference among propensity-score-matched patients who had received delayed surgery (second difference). The secondary outcome was the postoperative length of stay (in days).”

“The study included 42,230 patients who received hip fracture surgery from a total of 522 different surgeons at 72 hospitals. The mean cost (and standard deviation) attributed to the hip fracture was $39,497 ± $46,645 per person. The matched patients who underwent surgery after 24 hours had direct 1-year medical costs that were an average of $2,638 higher and a postoperative length of stay that was an average of 0.610 day longer compared with those who underwent surgery within 24 hours.”

Dr. Pincus commented to OTW, “Costs were higher and post-operative length of stay (LOS) was longer when surgery was delayed. Results were similar irrespective of the definition of delayed surgery used (>12-, 24-, 36-, or 48-hours). Advantages of the study include a population-based approach in a single-payer system where we can follow patients closely over time to calculate costs of their medical care.”

“Waiting for hip fracture surgery is associated with increased costs and longer hospital stays, in addition to complications. Costs may provide financial incentives to mitigate delays for hip fracture surgery.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy