LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/New TKA Pain Management Data From NYU/Columbia Universities
Large Joints and Extremities

New TKA Pain Management Data From NYU/Columbia Universities

August 13, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New TKA Pain Management Data From NYU/Columbia Universities
Source: Wikimedia Commons and MAKO
#totalkneearthroplastySecondary#knee#arthritis

A team of researchers from the New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases and Columbia University set out to determine which was more effective: adductor canal blocks or periarticular anesthetic injections (PAI)—both with bupivacaine—for managing the pain associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Their work, “Adductor Canal Block Compared with Periarticular Bupivacaine Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial,” appears in the July 5, 2018 edition of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Co-author Matthew Grosso, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon with the Center for Hip and Knee Replacement at Columbia University in New York, told OTW, “Pain control in total knee arthroplasty is continually evolving. Changes in the last decade have led to decreased pain, shorter length of hospital stay, faster return to activity, and overall improved outcomes.”

“However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal multimodal pain management strategy. Both adductor canal blocks and peri-articular injections have gained popularity for reducing pain in the perioperative period.”

“In this study, we wanted to determine which of these pain management strategies was more powerful, and whether there was any benefit to combining them.”

The authors wrote, “One hundred and fifty-five patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were randomized to 1 of 3 group: ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCKS alone (15mL of 0.5% bupivacaine), PAI alone (50 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine), and ADDUCTOR CANAL BLOCKS +PAI.”

“We found that adductor canal block alone (without a peri-articular injection) was least effective in controlling pain and reducing opioid consumption. This suggested that peri-articular injections are very effective in managing post-operative pain following TKA and should be used in almost all cases.”

“There seemed to be a small benefit from combining adductor canal blocks with a peri-articular injection, although the results were not statistically significant.”

Advertisement

“Peri-articular injections are an effective method for improving perioperative pain control and should be used as standard practice in TKA. This will result in decreased pain and reduced opioid consumption for patients in the post-operative period. Adductor canal blocks can be considered as an adjunct to PAIs, but not as a stand-alone treatment.”

“Peri-articular injections and adductor canal blocks should be part of the standard discussion with patients regarding multi-modal pain management following TKA. Patients should be counseled that utilizing peri-articular injections or adductor canal blocks with peri-articular injections will result in more comfort following surgery. This will allow them to take less opioid medication and have higher activity levels in the post-operative period.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy