LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/New Genetic Tool to Predict Osteoporosis, Fracture
Sports Medicine

New Genetic Tool to Predict Osteoporosis, Fracture

August 10, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Genetic Tool to Predict Osteoporosis, Fracture
Source: Wikimedia Commons, Anthony22, and Pixabay
Secondary#osteoporisis#genetics#geneticalgorithm

Genetics is in the spotlight again, with new research from Stanford highlighting a genetic screening tool that could help predict someone’s risk of osteoporosis and fracture.

The novel research, “Identification of 613 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and a polygenic risk score for bone mineral density, osteoporosis and fracture,” was published in the July 26, 2018 edition of PLoS ONE.

Stuart Kim, Ph.D. is professor of developmental biology, emeritus, at Stanford University, and was the sole author on the study. Using data from UK Biobank, he identified 1,362 independent SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) that clustered into 899 loci of which 613 are new. These data were then used to train a genetic algorithm using 22, 886 SNPs as predictors and showing a correlation with heel bone mineral density of 0.415. And when combined with height, weight, age and sex, it led to a correlation with heel bone mineral density of 0.496.

Participants with low scores (about 2.2% of total) showed a change in bone mineral density of -1.16 T-score unites, a 17.4x increase in risk for osteoporosis and a 1.87x increase in risk for fracture.

Kim told OTW, “I was interested in finding genetic markers to help athletes and military personnel avoid injuries, such as stress fracture. For athletes and military personnel, injuries affect not only their health but also their competitive success and military effectiveness. Getting a stress fracture shortly before the Olympics or the playoffs can eliminate an once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”

He added, “Stress fractures are commonplace in athletes due to the harsh rigors of physical training and overuse. The goal is to develop a genetic test that could alert the player and his/her trainer about injury risk in the preseason, so that preventative steps could be taken to reduce the risk of injury.”

According to Kim, the genetic algorithm for bone mineral density could also be used as a predictor of osteoporosis. He explained that genetic testing is quite common and a website could be set up to calculate the bone mineral density score for people with access to their genome data through participation in direct-to-consumer testing companies such as 23andme or Ancestry.com. And then the results can be confirmed by their doctor.

He said, “Genetic testing could reveal low bone mineral density in undiagnosed patients. This might be especially beneficial for younger individuals whose bone density can be readily increased by vitamins and weight-bearing exercises.

Advertisement

“The key result is the development of a genetic algorithm that shows a strong correlation with bone mineral density. The algorithm developed in this paper works about ten times better than the previous algorithm developed in 2012. The algorithm is based on a large number of DNA variants. Each DNA variant contributes only a small amount of information, but the overall information from all of the variants is substantial. The polygenic DNA score for osteoporosis is comparable in strength to well-known single gene tests, such as BRCA2 for breast cancer.”

Kim said that the next step is to test the effectiveness of the genetic algorithm in clinical trials, with a future goal to include genetic testing as part of standard of care for osteoporosis or for individualized training for athletes and military personnel.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy