LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Biologics/Stem Cell Reproduction Problem Solved?
Biologics

Stem Cell Reproduction Problem Solved?

July 25, 2018 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Stem Cell Reproduction Problem Solved?
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Montana State University
Secondary#mesenchymalstemcells#indianinstituteoftechnology

A major problem in working with stem cells to treat a variety of diseases is getting enough of them.

The only way to increase the numbers of stem cells, once they have been removed from the body, is to convince them to reproduce themselves in sufficient numbers to be useful. That problem may have been solved by a team of researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT), located in Powai, Mumbai, India.

Led by Dr. Abhijit Majumder, from the institute’s Department of Chemical Engineering, they found that a “hydrogel plate made of polyacrylamide is an ideal replacement for the conventionally used plastic culture plates. Unlike the plastic plates, the hydrogel plates ensured that stem cells placed on them multiplied and retained their stem cell-like nature—their stemness—for up to 51 days (20 generations) and differentiated into bone, cartilage or fat cells.”

When the mesenchymal stem cells were grown on plastic culture plates, they became large and flat, and irregular in shape. They stop multiplying and growing and reach senescence after a limited number of cell divisions.

With this discovery a major obstacle in using human mesenchymal stem cells to treat a variety of diseases may well have overcome.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy