LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Concussion: Dual-Task Gait Linked to Future Injury Risk
Sports Medicine

Concussion: Dual-Task Gait Linked to Future Injury Risk

July 5, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Concussion: Dual-Task Gait Linked to Future Injury Risk
Source: Flickr and John Martinez Pavliga CC BY 2.0
Secondary

At the recent National Athletic Trainers’ Association’s (NATA) 69th Clinical Symposia & AT Expo, held in New Orleans between June 26 and June 28, 2018, one of the new studies presented suggests that studying dual-task gait after a concussion can shed light on future injury risk.

To study dual-task gait outcomes, David Howell, Ph.D., ATC and colleagues evaluated 41 athletes within the first 21 days of concussion and again when they were deemed clinically recovered. The study protocol included a symptom inventory and instrumented dual-task gait evaluation, where they walked and completed a cognitive task (months backward, serial 7s backward, or spelling words backwards) while wearing an instrumented sensor system.

And then approximately one year post-concussion, they were asked to report any acute sport-related injury since returning to sports.

According to the data, the group who went on to sustain an acute injury (n=15; 38%) demonstrated significant average walking speed dual-task cost worsening across time (p = 0.005). In contrast, the group who did not sustain an injury walked with similar dual-task cost values at both time points (p = 0.45). In addition, symptoms improved for all participants (p = 0.78).

There were several limitations to the study including the fact that the questionnaire used to assess the injuries by participants in the year following their concussion was not validated against an existing metric and that neither clinical balance nor neurocognitive data were available.

Howell told OTW, “There were many challenging aspects to the study, but the most important was trying to contact people one year after their injury to assess whether or not they had sustained a concussion. We were able to successfully contact 42 individuals, but this only represented 61% of our participant sample.”

He said that one of the biggest takeaways from the study was that they identified worsened dual-task gait costs across a typical clinical recovery time line among those who went on to sustain an acute time-loss injury during the year following their concussion, but not for those who did not sustain an additional injury.

He added, “Although preliminary, these findings indicate that the ability to successfully execute a gait and cognitive task simultaneously may worsen across clinical recovery among those who go on to sustain a subsequent injury during sports.”

“Tests that incorporate simultaneous task performance across different domains may aid in identifying those at risk for further injury and thus assist clinical decision making,” he added.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy