LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Zimmer Snares $13.8 Million Patent Win Against Stryker
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Zimmer Snares $13.8 Million Patent Win Against Stryker

May 17, 2018 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Zimmer Snares $13.8 Million Patent Win Against Stryker
Source: Public Domain Pictures
#zimmerbiometSecondary#howmedicaosteonicscorp#patentlaw

More than a decade ago, Stryker Corp.’s Howmedica Osteonics Corp. sued and accused then Zimmer Holdings, Inc. of infringing on several polymer-patents.

On May 15, 2018, a federal judge in New Jersey awarded Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. $13.3 million in attorneys’ fees and another $500,000 in costs.

According to court documents reported by Law360, the award resulted in the invalidation of four of Howmedica’s patents.

In 2009, Zimmer asked that the polymer patent be re-examined. The appellate ruling supported a patent examiner’s findings.

Law360 reports that the patent was directed to a biomaterial widely used in hip and knee replacements. The examiner had rejected all the patent’s claims because they were either anticipated or obvious.

Claims “1 – 6 of the [patent] are inherently anticipated” the appeals court decided, and “claims 7 – 12 would have been obvious.”

The lawsuit goes back to February 2005, when Howmedica alleged that Zimmer infringed certain claims of the four related patents. The patents dealt with processes used to heat and irradiate polymers in medical implants.

In 2007 a New Jersey federal judge ruled that three of the patents were indefinite and therefore invalid. The Federal Circuit affirmed that decision in 2010.

Advertisement

In the meantime, Zimmer asked for an inter partes re-examination in 2009 of all claims in the fourth patent. The USPTO granted the request and a patent examiner eventually rejected each of the fourth patent’s claims.

The patents-in-suit included U.S. Patent Numbers 6,174,934; 6,372,814; 6,664,308; and 6,818,020.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy