LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/What! No Elmer’s? Novel Fracture Adhesive in Lab
Large Joints and Extremities

What! No Elmer’s? Novel Fracture Adhesive in Lab

May 11, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

What! No Elmer’s? Novel Fracture Adhesive in Lab
Source: KTH The Royal Institute of Technology
Secondary#fracture#knee#boneglue

Swedish researchers have developed a new biomedical adhesive that can be used for fracture fixation. Their work, “High‐Performance Thiol–Ene Composites Unveil a New Era of Adhesives Suited for Bone Repair,” was published in the April 2018 edition of Advanced Functional Materials.

Michael Malkoch, Ph.D., professor in Functional Organic Nanomaterials and a senior researcher in Biomedical Engineering at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden, and co-author on the study, told OTW, “The journey was initiated by colleagues from Karolinska University Hospital (neurosurgeons) and then after at South Stockholm Hospital (hand surgeons).”

“However, for use of biomedical adhesive in clinical setting a great number of criteria need be fulfilled. For soft-tissue fixations, medically approved super glues (e.g., Histoacryl) has extensively been used. Unfortunately, superglues are extremely reactive and do not discriminate between tissues resulting in adhesion between soft-tissue, tendons, etc. Additionally, super glues have low viscosity and [are] quite fragile in nature. Low viscosity may lead to diffusion into the fracture and thereof make more harm than good. As they are fragile they can’t really appropriately fixate fracture for proper healing.”

“Dental adhesives on the other hand have great fixation power but are based on typically questionable acrylate systems with bisphenol A as an important component (as well as a large portion of glass filler).

For adhesives to realistically be used for fracture fixations it was necessary to design novel glue components that can via robust and selective chemistry (click chemistry) transform to hard adhesives with unprecedented adhesion to wet bone tissue.”

“In this study we showcased a feasible approach to fixate bone fracture using the fiber reinforced adhesive patch (FRAP) method.”

“The setup is simple and has great similarity to the one used in dentistry, i.e., a bottom-up build-up of a customized FRAP for a given fracture. We used porcine metacarpals as they were most resembling human fingers and we utilized both transversal and oblique fractures. The FRAP is built by first cleansing the bone surface from soft tissue followed by careful molt of the bone surface. A primer was then applied for efficient bonding to the bone. A two-component adhesive with hydroxyapatite fillers was then added and that efficiently binds to the primer, chemically.”

“Biomedical approved fiber mesh was imbedded and the procedure can be repeated all over again depending on the load that the FRAP need to withstand. A top coating of the two-component adhesive completes the FRAP build-up. The FRAP is cured using a high-energy visible light source typically used by dentists.”

“While we have focused on finger fractures, it is inevitable that these adhesives are suited for the larger community of orthopedics (cranial, ankle, wrist etc.). The strategy can easily be transferred to minimally invasive surgery (local anesthesia) and towards more sensitive tissues, i.e., cervical fractures. Importantly, the FRAPs can coexist with current implants, especially when shattered fractures need proper fixation. Not to forget, the topological fixation strategy makes drilling, for instance in elderly patients, obsolete.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy