LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Latissimus Dorsi Transfer Rupture Underestimated
Large Joints and Extremities

Latissimus Dorsi Transfer Rupture Underestimated

May 3, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Latissimus Dorsi Transfer Rupture Underestimated
Source: Wikimedia Commons
#rotatorcuffSecondary#hip#latissimusdorsitransfer

Researchers from France and India have just published a study indicating that the rate of rupture of latissimus dorsi transfer is much higher than previously thought.

The study, “Arthroscopically-Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Insufficiency: Modes of Failure and Clinical Correlation,” appears in the April 2018 edition of Arthroscopy.

Jean-David Werthel, M.D., orthopedic surgeon with Clinique Bizet in Paris, France and co-author, told OTW, “We were concerned because we noticed that this procedure (latissimus dorsi transfer for painful loss of elevation) led to variable results in our patients with some doing very well and others not doing well at all but without any clear explanation.”

“Therefore, we thought that the rate of rupture of the tendon transfer previously reported in the literature was probably underestimated.”

“Our goal was to come up with a more reliable method to assess postoperative rupture of the tendon transfer. We used metallic markers that could be easily tracked on standard radiographs and found a rate of rupture much higher than previously thought: 38% versus 7% in the published literature.”

“The main point of interest in our method is the use of metallic markers to evaluate the rate of postoperative rupture of the tendon transfer. This allowed us to follow the integrity of the tendon transfer on standard radiographs rather than by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. These methods very likely underestimate the rate of postoperative rupture as some fibrous continuity can be observed and mistaken for a non-ruptured tendon transfer.”

“First of all, we found that the rupture rate was much higher than previously reported (38% versus 8%).”

“Secondly, we found that clinical results were very different between patients who had a ruptured transfer and those who did not. Patients who had an intact tendon transfer had a mean postoperative Constant score of 68.7 whereas those who had a ruptured transfer of 42.8.”

Advertisement

“When the tendon transfer remains intact it gives very satisfactory functional results. However, rupture rates are higher than previously thought. Different methods of fixation of the transfer without any tunnels inside the humeral head and without excessive tension could probably lower these rupture rates and therefore could lead to improved functional results.”

“Latissimus dorsi transfer does improve function and pain in patients with irreparable postero-superior rotator cuff tear and painful loss of elevation. New methods of fixation need to be investigated to improve this high rupture rate. We are currently evaluating different methods with rupture rates that seem to decrease to less than 10%.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy