LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Soccer: Groin Injury Hard to Predict
Sports Medicine

Soccer: Groin Injury Hard to Predict

April 2, 2018 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Soccer: Groin Injury Hard to Predict
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Embassy of the United States
Secondary#groininjuries#maleprofessionalsoccerplayers

Groin injuries are common in soccer players and often lead to substantial time being sidelined from the game. Being able to identify clear risk factors could help sports medicine physicians develop preventative strategies for their patients. Unfortunately, predicting which players are most at-risk is not easy.

According to a new study, “Musculoskeletal Screening Tests and Bony Hip Morphology Cannot Identify Male Professional Soccer Players at Risk of Groin Injuries: A 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study,” published online on March 27, 2018 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, hip/groin screening tests are not conclusive.

In their study, researchers investigated how effective musculoskeletal hip/groin screening tests and bony hip morphology were at identifying at-risk male professional soccer players.

They recruited 438 male professional soccer players aged 18 years or older, who had completed 609 player seasons with the Qatar Stars League. Each of these players underwent hip/groin screening which included pain provocation, range of motion and strength tests as well as hip radiographic examination, including an anteroposterior pelvic view and 45 degree Dunn view. They also determined bony hip morphology.

Any hip/groin injury that resulted in time-loss of a day or more was also recorded and the injuries were categorized as adductor-related, inguinal-related, iliopsoas-related, pubic-related, or hip-related or as “other”.

According to the data, there were 113 hip/groin injuries that met the inclusion criteria and 85 of those injuries were categorized as adductor-related. In addition, the following percentage of players had bony morphological variants: cam, 71%; pincer, 5%; and acetabular dysplasia, 13%.

Previous hip/groin injuries (HR, 1.8, 95% CI, 1.2-2.7) and eccentric adduction strength were associated with the risk of hip/groin injuries.

The researchers also found that higher than normal eccentric adduction strength was associated with an increased risk for all hip/groin injuries (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5), and that lower than normal eccentric adduction strength was associated with an increased risk for adductor-related injuries (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0). However, bony hip morphology was not associated with the risk of a groin injury.

The researchers wrote, “Previous groin injuries and eccentric adduction strength were associated with the risk of groin injuries. However, these associations were not strong enough to identify an ‘at-risk’ individual and therefor musculoskeletal screening tests were not useful to dictate individualized prevention strategies.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy